Taiwan dangling in limbo
The US State Department recognizes 194 states, including city-states such as the Holy See and Singapore and the principalities, or “micro-states,” of Liechtenstein and Monaco.
Excluded from this list is an entity that the State Department says may or may not be considered a country, depending on who you talk to.
The outsider is Taiwan, which meets all requirements for a sovereign country.
That Taiwan meets all criteria of a sovereign country is absolutely indisputable and beyond contention:
1. It has a clearly defined territory with internationally recognized boundaries.
2. It has a permanent population who possess identity cards, passports and home residency certificates.
3. It has a highly organized and advanced economy; it regulates both foreign and domestic trade/commerce. It issues its own currency.
4. It maintains educational institutions at all levels, thus proving itself capable of “social engineering.”
5. It has a highly developed transportation system for moving both people and goods.
6. It has five branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial, oversight and examination), in addition to a police force.
7. It has its own armed forces — army, navy, air force and marines.
8. It has a postal and banking system.
9. It has sovereignty over its defined territory.
10. It is recognized (albeit limited recognition) by other countries.
Tawan’s political problems have their sources in three main areas.
The deluded, megalomaniacal fools who control Taiwan pathetically insist that they have sovereignty over territory that they do not control. They pathetically cling to the chimerical “Republic of China,” which was superseded decades ago by the communist government of the People’s Republic of China across the Taiwan Strait. It is the abysmally wide gap or disjunction between reality and the delusional perceptions of Taiwan’s present rulers that causes so much trouble for Taiwan.
Taiwan’s problems are also a result of China’s incessant bullying, intimidation and meddling.
Lastly, Taiwan’s problems come, in no small measure, from political expediency, hypocrisy and shameful cowardice on the part of other nations — especially the “Great Western Democracies.” As an American, I am forced to admit that the US can be assigned much of the blame in regard to Taiwan’s unfortunate status.
Taiwan’s lonely “outsider” status is the result of dreadfully misguided policies by enemies of Taiwan — both external and internal.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
Parking needs to be green
Park your car in downtown Hualien for more than a minute and you’re bound to find a parking ticket fluttering on your windshield.
The city is extremely vigilant about ensuring that drivers pay to park. The city counts on this revenue, and rightly so.
My question is: Why do the parking enforcement officers drive around on scooters while issuing these tickets rather than riding bicycles?
There is a veritable army of enforcement officers patrolling very short “beats” of typically between one and two blocks in the downtown core.
Each officer does nothing but drive back and forth, issuing tickets in his or her short area, covering the same piece of ground literally hundreds of times each day.
The result, of course, is a lot of totally unnecessary pollution, not to mention unwarranted expense.
The environmentally friendly and cost-effective solution seems obvious: Replace these scooters with bicycles.
Selling the existing fleet of scooters could cover the cost of acquiring the bicycles, and the city would immediately realize significant savings by cutting fuel, maintenance and insurance costs.
In addition, locals and tourists alike could breathe easier with this sizable fleet of polluting scooters taken off the roads.
I hope the Hualien City government will recognize the merits of this course of action and do the responsible thing by making the change immediately.
It’s high time to go green!
JASON GRENIER
Hualien
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its