Thu, Apr 30, 2009 page8

• THE LIBERTY TIMES EDITORIAL: A mess of upgrades and mergers

  • • 
    • 
    • 

  In an attempt to make good on President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) election promises, earlier this month the legislature hurriedly passed amendments to the Local Government Act (地方制度法). The hasty and slapdash piece of legislation is tailor-made for the merger of Taichung City and County and their scheduled upgrade to municipality status next year.

  The move has been denounced as unfair by residents of other cities and counties around Taiwan, with calls for administrative reform to be applied across the board. Amid the clamor, there has been speculation that the KMT will use an upgrade of Taipei County’s status to manipulate the outcome of the county’s local government elections at the end of the year.

  Reform of administrative divisions is an essential and urgent task for maintaining the nation’s competitiveness. However, a blueprint for the reforms has not been made available to the public. Until then, attempts to manipulate the issue to promote individual parties or politicians at the expense of the public interest must be monitored. If the public remains vigilant, those in power will have to act with restraint.

  With various counties and cities stating their cases, at least seven schemes for administrative upgrading have been put on the table.

  These include the merging of and a status upgrade for Taichung County and City, Kaohsiung County and City, Tainan County and City, and Yunlin and Chiayi counties, as well as a status upgrade for Taipei, Taoyuan and Changhua counties. The reason why so many jurisdictions are clamoring for this treatment is that they are mindful of the government and legislature’s desire to avoid breaking a key election commitment.

  But the government and the legislature have failed to come up with complementary measures dealing with inequalities in tax revenue distribution. And in amending the Local Government Act, the legislature added a supplementary resolution that prevents the Ministry of the Interior from unilaterally deciding which counties and cities can be upgraded.

  Instead, all proposals must first be submitted by local governments and approved by county and city councils. Thus, the president’s top-down conception of implementing these reforms has been overturned and turned into a bottom-up enterprise. County and city governments and councils, fretting that they might end up as second-class citizens, have clamped themselves to the upgrade debate.

  Ma’s election promises go beyond next year’s merger of Taichung County and City. They say that by 2014 Taiwan will be reorganized into three municipalities (north, central and south) and 15 counties.

  But Ma’s agenda must overcome several challenges. It had been suggested that Taipei City and County merge with Keelung City to create a northern metropolis, but now, with Taipei County residents demanding that their county be upgraded on its own, there are reports that Taipei County will be elevated ahead of any merger. Therefore, there is also talk that the year-end election for Taipei County commissioner may be postponed. Conspiracy theories abound, asserting that the noble idea of upgrading the county’s status has been manipulated for political reasons. One way or another, the overall result is central government mismanagement.

  Taipei County, with a population of more than 3.8 million, does meet the conditions for an upgrade. In lobbying for this, Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and his predecessor threatened to resign if a merger between Taichung County and City took place before Taipei County’s upgrade. Last year, when Chou was pressing the central government to upgrade his county, Ma would not meet with him. Delivering a report to the Taipei County Council recently, Chou again declared that he would quit politics if Taipei County were upgraded to a municipality even one day later than Taichung. There is a suggestion, then, that Chou’s renewed pledge shows he has reached an unspoken agreement with Ma and the KMT.

  Greater Taichung’s imminent upgrade and Taipei County’s possibly independent upgrade highlight the fact that Taipei County has for decades possessed the most suitable conditions for a change in status — but to no avail. Though Ma’s team originally intended for Taipei County to merge with Taipei City and Keelung and thus be upgraded five years from now, it now seems Taipei County may be upgraded ahead of time.

  The KMT’s thinking is based on ulterior motives. Notably, the party’s position that Taipei County should be dealt with as part of a third wave of local authority upgrades has been replaced by the strong possibility of postponing the year-end county election. There is a school of thought that this delay would enhance the KMT’s prospects for re-election in the county; the KMT’s opponents are therefore calling it a “sly move.” But if the KMT respects the intelligence of voters, and if the incumbent county commissioner’s ratings and performance are as awful as polling suggests, the KMT should face the public instead of trying to find a way for him to hang around for another year.

  Taiwan’s administrative divisions demand an overhaul. Under Japanese rule, Taiwan was just one among several Japanese colonies and Tokyo was a faraway place. Yet top Japanese officials organized teams of bureaucrats to change Taiwan’s divisions no less than seven times in 50 years — from the original single prefecture and several counties to the final layout of five rural and three urban prefectures.

  In the five decades since the KMT took over Taiwan, the political and administrative environment has changed dramatically. Society has been transformed from one of extended families and clans to nuclear families with a highly mobile population. It has moved from an agricultural economy to one highly dependent on imports and exports, with flourishing industry, commerce and services. The population has grown tremendously over the same period.

  Yet this government, with its capital on Taiwanese soil, has never bothered getting down to the humble but important business of putting Taiwan’s administrative house in order. Even present plans for upgrades are no more than a patchwork solution.

  Ma’s government must closely consider plans for upgrades of all counties and cities and determine the best distribution of administrative resources.

  Above all, this issue must be separated from election strategizing in its entirety. The ruling party must reject the temptation to manipulate the issue to favor its candidates, and it must not allow the pressure of local political forces to sway its judgment.

  If, on the other hand, the KMT uses its near monopoly on power to do as it pleases, this will provide ready ammunition for the party’s opponents in the elections. The KMT could end up gaining a little but losing a lot.

  TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
• Most Popular

  • 1

    HSR to encircle Taiwan

  • 2

    MOFA welcomes Rubio’s Taiwan remarks

  • 3

    China seeks to divide Okinawa: report

  • 4

    Two local airlines could be fined for hard landings

  • 5

    SPEAK UP: Let’s check your horoscope for 2025 (2/2) 2025年12星座運勢揭曉（下）