After starting the day with prayers and songs in honor of the Prophet Mohammed's birthday, the students at the Madrasah al-Irsyad al-Islamiah in Singapore turned to the secular. An all-girls chemistry class grappled with compounds and acids, while other students focused on English, math and other subjects from the national curriculum.
Teachers exhorted their students to ask questions. Some, true to the school's embrace of new technology, gauged their students' comprehension with individual polling devices.
“It's like American Idol,“ said Razak Mohamed Lazim, the head of al-Irsyad, which means “rightly guided.”
A reference to the reality TV program in relation to an Islamic school may come as a surprise. But Singapore's Muslim leaders see al-Irsyad, with its strict balance between religious and secular studies, as the future of Islamic education, not only in Singapore but elsewhere in Southeast Asia.
Two madrasah in Indonesia have adopted al-Irsyad's curriculum and management, attracted to what they say is a progressive model of Islamic education in tune with the modern world. For them, al-Irsyad is the counterpoint to many traditional madrasah that emphasize religious studies at the expense of everything else. Instead of preaching radicalism, the school's in-house textbooks praise globalization and international organizations like the UN.
Leaders in Islamic education here rue the fact that, in much of the West, madrasah everywhere have been broad-brushed as militant hotbeds where students spend days learning the Koran by heart. Still, they were relieved that no terrorism suspect in the region in recent years was a product of Singapore's madrasah, though some suspects were linked to madrasah in Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries. That association deepened a long-running debate over the nature of Islamic education.
“The Muslim world in general is struggling with its Islamic education,” Razak said, adding that Islamic schools had failed to adapt to the modern world. “In many cases, it's also the challenge the Muslim world is facing. We are not addressing the needs of Islam as a faith that has to be alive, interacting with other communities and other religions.”
In Indonesia, most Islamic schools still pay little attention to secular subjects, believing that religious studies are enough, said Indri Rini Andriani, a former computer programmer who is the principal of al-Irsyad Satya Islamic School, one of the Indonesian schools that model themselves on the school here.
“They feel that conventional education is best for the children, while some of us feel that we have to adjust with advances in technology and what’s going on in the world,” Indri said.
Here, the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore, a statutory board that advises the government on Muslim affairs, gave al-Irsyad a central spot in its new Islamic center. Long the top academic performer among the country’s six madrasah, al-Irsyad was chosen to be in the center as “a showcase,” said Razak, who is also an official at the religious council.
The school's 900 primary and secondary-level students follow the national curriculum of the country's public schools while also taking religious instruction. To accommodate both, the school day is three hours longer than at the mainstream schools.
Mohamed Muneer, 32, a chemistry teacher, said most of his former students had gone on to junior colleges or polytechnic schools, while some top students attended the National University of Singapore.
“Many became administrators, some are teaching and some joined the civil service,” he said.
At the cafeteria, Ishak bin Johari, a 17-year-old who wants to become a newspaper reporter, said the balance between the secular and religious would help the school's graduates “lead normal Singaporean lives compared to other madrasah students.”
That balance resulted, like many things in this country, from pressure by the government. Singapore's madrasah — historically the schools for ethnic Malays who make up about 14 percent of the country’s population — experienced a surge in popularity in the 1990s along with a renewed interest in Islam.
But that surge, coupled with the madrasah's poor record in nonreligious subjects, high dropout rates and graduation of young people with few marketable job skills, worried the government. It responded by making primary education at public schools compulsory in 2003, allowing exceptions like the madrasah, provided they met basic standards by next year. If they fail, they will have to stop educating primary schoolchildren.
Last year, the first time all six madrasah were required to sit for national exams at the primary level, two failed to meet minimal standards, though they still had two more years to pass.
Al-Irsyad, which was the first to alter its curriculum, outperformed the other madrasah. But neither it nor the others made any of the lists of best performing schools or students compiled by the Education Ministry in Singapore.
Mukhlis Abu Bakar, an expert on madrasah at the National Institute of Education who also was a member of al-Irsyad’s management committee in the 1990s, said the madrasah still had a long way to go to catch up with mainstream schools. While Singapore's teachers are among the most highly paid civil servants, the madrasah have had trouble attracting teachers because they rely only on tuition and donations, he said.
“I think al-Irsyad has not achieved a level where I would say it is a model for Islamic education, but ... the system it has in place could become one,” he said.
Still, it began to draw students who would not have attended a madrasah otherwise. Noridah Mahad, 44, said she had wanted to send her two older children to madrasah but worried over the quality of education. With al-Irsyad's adoption of the national curriculum, she felt no qualms in sending her third child.
“Here they teach many things other than Islam,” she said.
Al-Irsyad said it was in talks to export its model to madrasah in the Philippines and Thailand. In Indonesia, Dahlan Iskan, the chairman of Jawa Pos Group, one of the country's biggest media companies, opened a school modeled on Singapore's. And a conglomerate, the Lyman Group, backed al-Irsyad Satya.
Poedji Koentarso, a retired diplomat, led the search for Lyman, visiting madrasah all over Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.
“We shopped around,” he said. “It was a difficult search in the sense that often the schools were very religious, too religious.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which