Dismissing Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng’s (王金平) proposal for an interparty legislative task force to monitor the government’s performance on cross-strait matters, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) reiterated in an interview published yesterday that the legislature’s committees already fulfill the function of keeping the government in check.
“Don’t amend the system, because it isn’t flawed. Letting it run as usual will do,” Ma was quoted as saying in the interview with the Chinese-language China Times.
But is the system indeed flawless and are officials complying with the rules? Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) failed to report to the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee two days in a row, which was one reason behind yesterday’s clash between Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Yi-ying (邱議瑩) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee Ching-hua (李慶華).
Legislative committees will be hard pressed to monitor the government’s policies if officials do not report to them on those policies and field lawmakers’ questions.
In recent days, the Mainland Affairs Council has been running ads on TV assuring viewers that the government’s China policies will not jeopardize Taiwan’s sovereignty or national interest.
Public skepticism is not likely to dissipate, however, considering that the government’s prime negotiator in talks with China has repeatedly failed to brief lawmakers on crucial details. And if legislators feel they know few specifics, the public will have been told even less.
This weekend, Chiang is scheduled to meet his Chinese counterpart, Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), to discuss matters including direct sea links and expanding direct air links. It seems clear at this point that the two sides will forge ahead with agreements on these issues, making Chiang’s absence from the legislative meeting even more disconcerting.
Considering that neither lawmakers nor the public are adequately informed on the content of such talks — nor in a position to supervise the decision-making process — it is difficult to understand the president’s confidence in the health of the nation’s checks and balances.
An effective means of supervision is urgently needed, now that the Ma administration intends to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with Beijing without first submitting it for approval to legislative vote, referendum or both. The government is denying legislators and the public the right to comment on whether an ECFA would be in Taiwan’s best interests.
Transparency must be the government’s goal, now more than ever. Despite Ma’s confidence, the legislature’s committees do not seem able to ensure that transparency exists and so allay public concerns. His categorical rejection of an interparty legislative task force may therefore leave observers with the impression that strengthening checks and balances is not high on the government’s list of priorities.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS