Before the G20 summit, China made a series of high-profile moves, notably comments by People’s Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan (周小川) about replacing the US dollar with special drawing rights or a global reserve currency.
China achieved little at the summit and its currency proposals were not discussed, despite the pre-summit hype. It even had to rely on US help to have Hong Kong and Macau removed from a list of tax havens.
China made little headway toward its goal of strengthening its status in the IMF. The US$40 billion it pledged to the IMF was a mere 4 percent of what other countries pledged to counter the financial crisis; the decision-making power China will receive in return is a far cry from its expectations.
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s (溫家寶) concerns expressed at a press conference following an earlier meeting of the National People’s Congress on the safety of China’s US investments, together with Zhou’s proposals, imply that things are not as rosy in China as many analysts in Taiwan believe when they refer to China’s increasing strength.
After reforming and opening its economy, the Chinese government used an authoritarian development model to oppress workers, exploit the environment and mobilize the nation to increase exports. Collusion between officials and business drove farmers from their lands so that the model could create an export miracle in coastal areas.
These export centers also started to take in displaced and unemployed farmers, which helped to alleviate social tensions. However, this growth model — purely driven by external demand — hides a deeper inequality: Under strict government controls, laborers have long been unable to demand higher wages, while China’s near US$2 trillion in foreign exchange has been used as a bargaining chip for state-owned enterprises that blindly spend on expansion.
Together with weak domestic demand, this has made the Chinese economy heavily dependent on US consumers, who pay for this consumption with borrowed money.
The authoritarian development model helps to increase exports and earn foreign exchange, but it has also contributed to China’s US dollar-based financial problems. Anything that affects the status of the US dollar will see China’s US$2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves decrease in value. Therefore, the more China tries to challenge the US for the post of global financial leader, the more it hurts its national strength. This Catch-22 situation was reflected in the outcome of the G20 summit.
If analysts are serious about China becoming stronger, they should encourage Beijing to deal with the changing situation calmly by adapting to it and not getting carried away with dreams of becoming a great power.
China’s leaders must stop issuing large loans to state-owned enterprises in order to buy out domestic and overseas firms or make large capital-intensive investments to meet growth projections. They should instead invest in raising the incomes of the lower classes to increase spending power and create domestic demand; encourage China-based Taiwanese businesses to move from export production toward producing for the Chinese market; and deregulate the yuan and cease manipulating exchange rates. It must enhance political participation and let people other than business and bank leaders create policy.
China has a long way to go before it becomes a truly powerful nation. Economic transformation must be accompanied by a political transformation.
Chen Ming-chi is an assistant professor at National Tsing Hua University’s Institute of Sociology and a member of the executive committee of the university’s Center for the Study of Contemporary China.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Wu Qian (吳謙) announced at a news conference that General Miao Hua (苗華) — director of the Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission — has been suspended from his duties pending an investigation of serious disciplinary breaches. Miao’s role within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) affects not only its loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but also ideological control. This reflects the PLA’s complex internal power struggles, as well as its long-existing structural problems. Since its establishment, the PLA has emphasized that “the party commands the gun,” and that the military is
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS