On March 18, media revealed that a large quantity of materials related to political cases from the 1950s White Terror, as well as ordinary criminal cases, had been uncovered at the Investigation Bureau’s investigation center, known as the “Ankang Guesthouse” (安康招待所) in the Ankeng (安坑) area in Taipei County’s Xindian City. The discovery came as a shock to everyone who cares about transitional justice and the history of Taiwan’s struggle for democracy. The Ankang Guesthouse case is, however, merely the tip of the iceberg.
Most of the cases of political persecution under the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) authoritarian regime that have been made public are cases that had already been turned over to military courts. There are very few records of what happened at the pre-trial stages of arrest, interrogation and extraction of confessions. This most important piece of the puzzle has been missing for those attempting to find out the truth about what happened during the White Terror era.
As many of the departments concerned have been reorganized or disbanded over the years, their records are now distributed among various agencies. For example, files from the former Secrecy Bureau of the Ministry of National Defense (MND), which was responsible for investigating cases related to the underground communist Taiwan Province Work Committee in 1949 and the early 1950s, are now in the hands of Department No. 4 of the Investigation Bureau under the Ministry of Justice. Those of the former Peace Preservation Department under the Police Headquarters, which handled political cases besides those related to the Taiwan Province Work Committee, may have been handed over to the Intelligence Department of the Coast Guard Administration, and then given to the Reserve Command, and so on.
Considering this state of affairs, the National Archives Administration (NAC), which is the central government agency with overall responsibility for public records, is the department best suited for finding and collecting all records of political cases, wherever they may be.
The Archives Act (檔案法) stipulates that files may be marked for permanent or fixed-period archiving. Files designated for permanent archiving must be handed over to the NAC for preservation as state archives. Those marked for fixed-period archiving may be destroyed at the end of the designated storage period, but first they are supposed to be collated and sent to be checked by the NAC.
However, many people doubt whether the NAC is really able to ensure that other departments catalog their files in the proper detailed manner. Moreover, it is up to the various departments themselves to decide how long files must be kept. If the people in charge of intelligence agencies fail to recognize the value of these historical documents, they may mark them for fixed-period archiving, in which case they are likely to be destroyed when the time is up. If that happens, organizations and individuals who seek to probe the truth about how Taiwan was governed in the past will draw a blank. Once lost, the records can never be replaced.
To ensure the preservation of these records, the NAC should quickly instruct all departments that were ever responsible for investigating political cases or collecting political intelligence to check their own records of such cases, as well as files that may have been passed on to them by departments that no longer exist, and to mark all such files for permanent archiving. Departments that should be notified include the Investigation Bureau under the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), the Military Intelligence Department under the Reserve Command, the National Security Bureau, the Presidential Office, the Judge Advocates Bureau and General Political Warfare Bureau under the Ministry of National Defense, the Military Police Command, the National Police Administration under the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
There is another problem. Some of these government departments are still responsible for investigating political matters. Officials in charge of such departments often refuse to declassify files about political cases or hand them over to the NAC, basing their refusal on the National Intelligence Services Act (國家情報工作法). These conflicts of interest should be resolved through political consultation. For example, the president could issue instructions to the MND, and the premier to the MOJ to facilitate declassification of political case records. The NAC should set out more complete guidelines to provide researchers with more open access to these records, giving adequate attention to the privacy of concerned individuals on the one hand and the search for historical truth on the other.
Following the Ankang Guest House discovery, there have been reports in the media that the NAC and the Investigation Bureau will give a report on the incident at the Legislative Yuan. However, as we have seen, the task of collecting documents involves many different departments, so it cannot be done by the Legislative Yuan’s Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, the NAC or any other agency acting alone. All the departments that have files relating to political cases in their possession must recognize that in today’s democratic Taiwan these documents are the common property of the whole nation.
We call on the KMT and the government to do all they can to get these files declassified. After all, Taiwan has come a long way in modernizing its intelligence agencies and bringing them under the control of the state instead of one political party or leader, as in the past. Besides, fewer and fewer of the people involved are still alive, so declassifying the files will not have any great negative impact on living individuals. If the task of declassifying these files and making them public can be completed within the term of the current KMT government, it would be the clearest indication that Taiwan is now a mature democracy.
Yeh Hung-ling is executive secretary of the Taiwan Association for Truth and Reconciliation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS