US President Barack Obama’s dramatic intervention into the fate of the US’ big three carmakers has sent a signal to the global auto sector to get its act together or drown.
The ouster of Rick Wagoner and Christian Streiff as chief executives of General Motors (GM) and Peugeot Citroen on Monday sent tremors through the boardrooms of the battered auto industry.
Lacking the systemic importance of the banking sector, which has been bailed out with trillions of dollars, the car industry is being left to bleed to death — or consolidate.
This month, Martin Winterkorn, chief executive of Volkswagen — the world’s third-largest car maker and sure-fire survivor of the financial crisis — told 200 analysts and reporters he could see the survival of one Japanese firm, perhaps a few Chinese, two or three Europeans and an American — Ford, clearly.
Even Toyota, the most likely Japanese survivor, which is run by a close-knit team of visionary engineers dedicated to eco-friendly technological innovation, is in trouble as the industry’s expectations for global sales of 70 million have turned into, at best, 50 million this year. US sales alone could halve to little more than 8.5 million.
In Europe sales could fall by between 20 percent and 30 percent and are now held up in a dozen countries by “scrappage” — payments for scrapping older cars. The 780 billion euro (US$1.04 trillion) European car industry suffers from at least 20 percent overcapacity and structural problems pre-dating the crisis.
The industry will see a shake-out in the coming year that could mean only a handful of firms remain in business. Volswagen, which is virtually in Porsche’s hands, will be one of them. French President Nicolas Sarkozy will do his damnedest to ensure that at least Renault — part-owner of Nissan and itself 30 percent state-owned — survives.
Daimler, owner of Mercedes, and BMW may be forced into a premium merger. Even in an Obama-backed shotgun marriage with Chrysler, Italy’s Fiat may bite the dust.
In Asia, China’s 150 auto firms will be forced by Beijing into a series of mergers and acquisitions. India’s Tata will — if it survives its expensive Jaguar Land Rover takeover — dominate the landscape, and in South Korea Kia is likely to emerge as the big player, with Hyundai — linked to GM — on a funeral pyre.
Wagoner was fired by Obama because he had failed to lay the ground for the “green” revolution and had driven what was the world’s biggest carmaker for 80 years into a brick wall as it ran out of cash. Insiders say that, with more genuine independent directors on his board, he would have gone years ago.
His departure underlines that Obama meant what he said during his presidential campaign when he warned the industry it should be on a sustainable path in an era of “peak oil” and the need for fuel-efficiency. The global industry, with a few exceptions, ignored his message. Top carmakers have been lobbying the EU for years to get Brussels to water down its environmental plans to cut car emissions levels.
But other car bosses could now be vulnerable as the industry looks for new leadership to reflect the changed agenda. Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche and BMW head CEO Norbert Reithofer could be next in the firing line as premium carmakers suffer disproportionately from the global collapse of sales.
At Daimler, Zetsche, the walrus-mustached former head of Chrysler during a disastrous 10-year marriage, is struggling to contain a plunge in Mercedes sales after a profit warning, amid speculation it might be forced to merge with BMW, its bitter rival.
BMW’s Reithofer has so far retained the support of the Quandt family, who owns 46 percent of the firm. But the family, which rescued a near-bankrupt BMW 50 years ago, is expanding its interests elsewhere. Reithofer is also surrounded by a new, more youthful board, including sales chief, Ian Robertson.
Carl-Peter Forster, president of GM Europe and a former BMW director, may also feel the heat as a US$3.3 billion rescue plan for Opel, Vauxhall and Saab falters in the wake of the White House’s rejection of Wagoner’s restructuring program. At most, it buys German Chancellor Angela Merkel more time to sort out the threat to a quarter of a million jobs before the Sept. 29 general election.
Streiff, victim of a boardroom coup, was not even thanked for his stint as Peugeot chief in a curt statement from chairman Thierry Peugeot, who is appointing Corus boss, Philippe Varin, to succeed him.
Varin, former head of aluminium group Pechiney, is highly regarded after turning around Anglo-Dutch Corus, integrating British Steel and Hoogovens and presiding over the sale to India’s Tata group. Streiff, the former deputy chief executive of glassmaker St Gobain and who reportedly suffered a mini-stroke last year, made enemies in the boardroom and lost its confidence — including crucially that of the controlling Peugeot family — with his abrasive style, sole focus on cost-cutting that shed 11,000 jobs and lack of strategic vision, including for mergers.
He had previously lasted just 100 days as head of Airbus as his drive to cut costs and lack of diplomatic skills alienated the key Franco-German players, including both governments, at the planemaker’s owner, EADS.
There will be upheavals not only in boardrooms as the tarnished old guard makes way for the “green new deal” protagonists of electric cars, but in the industry as a whole.
Obama has ensured this with the stroke of a pen — and an unprecedentedly blunt intervention.
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: