Already under pressure to create jobs and growth while clinging to absolute power, China’s Communist Party faces a growing headache from Internet users keen to expose its members’ sometimes questionable habits.
A pair of receipts from an upscale karaoke club sparked the latest Internet-led furor over government corruption earlier this month, ending the career of a mid-level bureaucrat from Liuyang in Hunan Province.
Scanned and uploaded by a nameless surfer, the dockets listed 47,000 yuan (US$7,000) worth of dining, massage and other services, prompting Internet users to ask how a public servant in a local media watchdog could stretch his meager government salary so far.
The Liuyang scandal followed a string of similar media storms in recent months, triggered by the Internet exposures of officials enjoying luxury overseas holidays in the name of “study” trips, or photographed wearing expensive-looking watches.
With China’s state-controlled media often reluctant to report, and Party-appointed watchdogs sometimes embroiled in scandals themselves, China’s Internet users have taken it upon themselves to ferret out official corruption.
“There is a sense that the central government has lost control over the county and city level officials in many places,” said Rebecca McKinnon, an Internet expert at Hong Kong University. “We’ve got the financial crisis and a lot of people concerned about corruption and how the nation’s finances are managed.”
Graft is hardly new in China, where the ruling Communist Party has warned it could prove to be its downfall.
But the latest scandals come amid demands for more transparency in the central government’s 4 trillion yuan stimulus plan to pump up the flagging economy.
“This year is clearly a very sensitive year politically ... We’ve got all kinds of reasons why the government would feel nervous,” McKinnon said.
Fall-out from the global financial crisis has seen China’s once-booming export machine falter and some 20 million workers lose their jobs, fanning fears of social unrest.
Another 1.2 million university graduates are out of work, weeks before Beijing passes the 20th anniversary of a bloody crackdown on student-led demonstrations centered on Tiananmen Square.
As always, the government has attempted to stifle calls for political reform, launching an Internet crackdown in January ostensibly targeting pornography, but also shutting down blogging Web sites hosting debate deemed too edgy.
The ham-fisted suppression campaign, accompanied by the detention of dissidents calling for democratic reforms in a widely circulated online petition, has failed to silence critical Internet chatter.
Surfers have delighted in the “grass-mud horse,” an Internet fad of videos and cartoons that uses a vulgar pun to mock the government’s “harmonious society” slogan and protest online controls.
The corruption cases keep appearing online, then appearing in the papers, while edgy political discussions remain no less visible.
A LOSING BATTLE?
With an estimated 3,000 new Web sites created daily and more than 6 million new users coming online every month, the government is fighting a losing battle to stifle undesirable content, according to analysts.
“Scale is the killer here as far as control goes,” said a Beijing-based IT manager who declined to be named.
“They can only be selective and surgical about unwanted content. They can look for unwanted signals and then when the signals are picked up, they can redirect the cavalry to the hotspot and get into it,” the manager said.
While China’s Internet surveillance remains highly pervasive, the surging tide of new subscribers is gradually forcing a change of tack in the way the government deals with the country’s 300 million Internet users.
Before the country’s annual parliament earlier this month, Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) held an online chat with Internet users, answering moderated questions about the global financial crisis, house prices, health care and checks on government power.
Officials in Yunnan Province invited Internet users to participate in a probe into a death of a young man in custody last month, which police at the detention center initially blamed on a game of hide-and-seek gone awry.
Internet users have been invited to become delegates in local people’s congresses, alongside more traditionally token representatives of farmers and “model workers.”
“I was surprised ... The government had noticed what I had done online,” said Wang Xiaoli, a 46-year-old freelance photographer who was chosen as a member of parliament in Luoyang, a city in central Henan Province.
Chinese leaders’ engagement with Internet users and encouragement of their supervision of government functions is a positive development, if not wholly heart-felt, according to Hu Xingdou (胡星斗), a free media advocate and economics professor at the Beijing Institute of Technology.
“The attitude of government contains two aspects: They will continue to crack down on dissidents more and more severely, but they will tolerate the common people’s voices that crowd the Internet,” Hu said.
Few in China have any illusions that the Internet-triggered scandals that catch minor officials with their pants down could embroil a big fish with ties to Beijing.
“It is by no means certain that the dialogue will lead to changes to the system,” said Wang Xixin (王錫鋅), a law professor at Peking University. “But it gives us space to imagine and expect.”
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means