American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Raymond Burghardt recently visited Taipei and met leaders of both the ruling and opposition parties. When talking to the media, Burghardt expressed concern over China’s military threats to Taiwan and said Beijing posed a military threat to Taiwan as long as it has missiles aimed at Taiwan and that it should remove them. Perhaps President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government mistakenly believes that some of the messages Burghardt conveyed were in line with their own policies. But the Ma administration is kowtowing to China despite the hundreds of missiles aimed at us. This shows how the Ma administration is obsessed with China while the US continues to keep its wits.
China’s military threat toward Taiwan is not something new. The 23 million people of Taiwan, regardless of their political affiliation and ethnicity, cannot escape the fact that they live each day with the threat of China’s missiles.
However, the administration, which constantly talks about putting Taiwan first and doing what is best for the people of Taiwan, is really only concerned with Beijing’s “one China” principle and its dream that China will give Taiwan some international space.
The government believes simply relying on China will be enough to save Taiwan economically. It has never addressed the military threat that China poses to Taiwan. Perhaps Ma’s team sees the 1,000-plus missiles as something pleasing, not the terrible threat they are.
Why does Burghardt have the courage to demand that China remove its missiles, while the Ma administration appears to care less about them? The reason is simple. The Ma administration has to beg China for many things and it cannot afford to offend Beijing because it sees China as Taiwan’s savior. It’s heavy reliance on China means it does not dare do anything not in line with China’s thinking.
Let’s look at it this way: Ma kowtowed to China for nine months before more than a fraction of the 3,000 Chinese tourists per day that he hoped would save Taiwan’s ailing economy actually started coming here. The Amway China cruise came to Taiwan and the government used 1,000-plus participants and the money they spent here to boast of what a great job it has been doing to bolster the economy. Officials keep talking about the benefits, and even the necessity of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, but so far there has been no word that Beijing would actually agree to one.
Given these circumstances, how would Ma have the courage to demand that China remove their missiles?
The Taiwanese should not bother dreaming that Ma will make such demands. Neither the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Ma administration have made a formal demand during the cross-strait economic, trade and cultural forum or other cross-strait talks that China remove its missiles. The administration’s cross-strait policies and dependence on China make it appear like a drug addict. It will never be able to kick its China habit. Direct links, Chinese tourism, the Straits Exchange Foundation-Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait pacts and relaxation of the restrictions on Chinese investment all clearly show how the government wants to make Taiwan’s economy completely dependent upon China’s. Once China has control over Taiwan’s core businesses, unification will be a mere formality.
Of course the loosening of trade restrictions and steps toward an ECFA have been welcomed by some businesses, support the government has used as an excuse to ignore public criticism. In terms of cross-strait trade, however, a conflict exists between the interests of those businesses and the public. Employment opportunities will plunge when Taiwanese businesses head to China in search of low-cost labor. Things may get so tough that people will not even be able to afford school lunches for their children. As unemployment rises and real wages drop, income distribution will rapidly deteriorate and we will ultimately see the formation of an M-shaped society where only certain individuals will be able to enjoy the benefits of economic growth.
Beijing has often said that its missiles are meant to guard against Taiwanese independence. The missiles are really aimed at expediting unification. But since this is in line with Ma’s goal of eventual unification, he views the missiles differently from the average Taiwanese and from the US. This difference explains Ma’s lack of regard for public opinion despite his “three noes” policy — no unification, no independence and no use of force.
Ma wants to lock Taiwan’s economy to China so that Chinese investment can flood the country. He is quite happy to postpone military procurements crucial to national defense and reduce the size of the military.
The public must wake up and face reality, no matter how many tourist extravaganza “reality” shows the government keeps throwing in our faces.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS