Since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) returned to power with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) election, Taiwan’s human rights situation has gradually deteriorated. When Chinese emissary Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited Taiwan last November, the government mobilized 5,000 police officers to suppress public demonstrations and even went so far as to ban the display of the national flag and broadcasting of Taiwanese songs. The chilling atmosphere spontaneously led our thoughts back to the Martial Law era.
Now KMT legislators have come up with the idea of adding an immunity clause for elected officials to the draft amendment to the Computer-Processed Personal Data Protection Act (電腦處理個人資料保護法). This would open the door wide to attempts to invade the privacy of any individual citizen. KMT legislators may claim to be doing this to protect the public, but they are in effect reflecting the mindset of those who want to establish a new Martial Law era.
The amendment — proposed by KMT Legislator Hsieh Kuo-liang (謝國樑) — says elected officials would be exempt from informing an individual that private information has been gathered about them for use by the elected official in an elected assembly for interpellation or any other political purposes related to their duties.
If this amendment were passed, elected officials would be able to gather information about a person’s assets, debt, background, medical history, information, faith, political inclination and even sexual orientation and other activities at will, simply by claiming that they are carrying out their political responsibilities. If that were to happen, information about our private lives would become available to anyone.
In addition, come election time, incumbent elected officials would be able to use this privilege to find out everything about their opponents and their campaign teams and use it to attack them or create a scandal. We cannot even begin to contemplate the preposterous situation we would be in if such powers were extended to elected officials at all levels of government.
It is ironic that the Ministry of Justice claims “there are no threats to private data protection” while KMT legislators want to use the data protection act to legitimize violating people’s privacy. We must remind these KMT legislators that the duty of a legislator is to monitor the government, not to investigate the private matters of individual citizens.
An individual’s private matters can only be investigated by the judiciary in accordance with the law and on a case by case basis. For almost a year now, the government has been unable to govern, the economy is in a recession and people have problems making ends meet while the government is leaning heavily toward China and denigrating Taiwan’s national sovereignty.
The KMT, with its absolute legislative majority, fails to fulfill its duty of monitoring the government and putting it back on track, and instead it directs its efforts toward suppressing the public. These are not the actions of an institution representing the public, but rather of one that wants to help the government threaten it.
In the US, for example, the Congress’ right to investigate is based on monitoring the executive organs. It is exercised by congressional committees and individual congressmen cannot do so at their own will.
The right is normally exercised through public hearings, and the investigated parties and witnesses can be forced to attend a hearing to give evidence and provide relevant data. The investigated parties and witnesses can also hire defense lawyers and the media can attend and report on the process.
Article 45 of the Act Governing the Exercise of Legislative Power (立法院職權行使法) clearly states that: “The legislature may, following a decision by the legislature, establish an investigative committee, or, following a decision by a committee, establish a special investigative team and request that concerned institutions provide reference materials for issues pertinent to a specified case.”
Judging from this, legislators have no individual investigative rights and they are restricted to investigating public institutions, with no right to gather information about individual citizens. Taiwan’s investigative rights are much less complete than those of the US. Still, amazingly, KMT legislators dare to do nothing about strengthening supervision of the government and instead use this data protection act to expand their powers in ways that are not supported by the Act Governing the Exercise of Legislative Power, thus violating fundamental, constitutionally protected human rights.
The exemption clause proposed by KMT legislators has been called “a clause aimed at specific legislators.” The nickname highlights how KMT legislators that are in the habit of revealing information as a way of settling political scores have proposed this measure to exempt themselves from legal responsibility. Ever since the Ma government came to power, it has been busy settling scores with officials from the previous government.
This is often achieved by having a legislator reveal information that is then echoed by every pan-blue media outlet and political commentator to force the hand of prosecutors, police and judges. They will not let up until the accused has been deemed guilty in the court of public opinion even before they have their day in court. The targets of this settling of scores have their private and personal details revealed to the public, trivial or significant, true or false — it is character assassination, pure and simple.
The sharp end of these tricks will be turned on the general public and this is as frightening as the coming of a new white terror. This is no trivial matter, and Ma and KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) should make it clear beyond any doubt whether they support this attempt by KMT legislators to overstep their duties.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS