There are old pistols and bulls' heads on the walls, live country and western music, waiters dressed as cowboys. The Gun Smoke restaurant could be anywhere in the world — but this is the exclusive Gulberg district in Lahore.
The whiskey bottles are filled with tea. In the Islamic republic of Pakistan, there are only “mocktails” to wash the burgers down. Hassan “Jimmy” Khan is singing Johnny Cash. A 22-year-old economics student with a hippy beard and floppy hair, he has always lived in Lahore: “I love it, I wouldn't live anywhere else.”
Here, amid the drinkers and diners in jeans and shirts, last week's terrorist attack on the visiting Sri Lankan cricket team, even though it took place less than about a kilometer away, is forgotten.
Asher Mian, a 31-year-old accountant had brought his wife and baby daughter to Gun Smoke.
“That’s the beauty of Lahore. People carry on,” he said.
The attack, in which six policemen and a driver died, has provoked scenes unprecedented in Pakistan. Even after bloodier previous attacks, no one lit candles on the scarred bomb sites. The mundane roundabout where the Lahore killings occurred has been converted into a makeshift shrine — both to the dead and to the end of the idea that somehow this city of 10 million would be spared the violence racking the rest of Pakistan.
This weekend, hundreds of bunches of flowers lay piled up before a poster, issued by the police, that reads: “We are in pain: no more bloodshed.”
Lahore has never been like the rest of Pakistan. It has always been known as the most cultural, tolerant and cosmopolitan of the nation’s major cities. Karachi, the vast port in the south, faces the Gulf, Peshawar is turned towards central Asia. But Lahore, with its Mughal architecture, teeming bazaars and canals, remains very much part of the subcontinent.
The city is home both to vast slums and the headquarters of the Pakistan's biggest political Islamist movement, and to lively cafes, galleries, cultural centers, fashion shows, interior designers' studios and even a thriving gay scene. Parties thrown by the young Lahori elite have a reputation for daring even among blase Karachi socialites. Gastronomy is part of life, as is cinema. Lahore is home to the Pakistani film industry: Lollywood.
Kamiar Rokni, one of Pakistan’s leading clothes designers, is a fixture in the city high-life. The 32-year-old said last week that Lahore was the “cultural hub” of Pakistan.
“Lahore has always been a city where individuality has been embraced. It's been a safe city for such a long time, people have always gone about their business and not felt afraid ... So the attack on the cricketers is unfathomable,” he said.
Others spoke of the shame of such a breach of traditions of hospitality.
“In Pakistan, you do everything for your guests. Your guests are first priority. Even if you go hungry, they must eat,” Ghulam Ali, a student, said. “Now we won’t see any more cricket teams for the next 10 to 15 years. Forget cricket teams: No foreigners will visit.”
And that, all agree, would be an immense blow to the spirit of the city. Sonnu Rahman, an 82-year-old history teacher and life-long Lahore resident, said that over centuries “all the different creeds and religions ... the Hindus, the Sikhs, Muslims, Christians ... got absorbed in this wonderful soil of ours.”
“Even now, left to themselves, the people of Lahore are tolerant,” she said. “It's just that they are used by these blasted politicians.”
It is not as if Lahore has never suffered before. There have been a series of attacks over recent years. More than 20 were killed when a police building was bombed a year ago. A series of explosions at the city's theaters, juice bars (targeted for being “dating spots”) and threats to DVD markets to stop selling supposedly “pornographic” movies revealed a rising tide of local religious vigilantism. But this most recent attack has brought home to the city — and the country as a whole — how bad things have got.
“After Benazir Bhutto was assassinated [in December 2007] we thought it could not get any worse,” said Farzana Shaikh, an analyst at London’s Chatham House think tank. “But it has. We won't see a dramatic explosion or implosion. We will just see bits of the country drifting out of government control.”
Though Pakistan has repeatedly shown a resilience that has astonished those who repeatedly predict its imminent failure as a state — few other nations could have absorbed an economic crash, the assassination of its best-known political leader, a secessionist insurgency and a wave of religious militant violence in the space of 18 months without disintegrating — the international community is now deeply concerned for the future.
Last week, a US diplomat said openly what government analysts around the world have long said privately: Pakistan, with its crashing economy, nuclear arms and raging Islamic militant insurgency, is of greater concern than Afghanistan. The logic is simple: You can lose Afghanistan and still keep Pakistan, but the reverse is not true.
When the violence stays far away in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) — seven policemen died in a car bomb on Saturday, a local mayor was killed on Friday — the impact is less. On the Afghan border, though some areas are being clawed back from their hands, vast areas are still under the de facto rule of the “Pakistani Taliban.” Last month, the NWFP government agreed to a truce with Islamic militants that would see a rigorous version of Shariah law imposed in the Swat valley, just three hours drive from Islamabad, the capital.
But it is the major attacks on high-profile targets close to the centers of cultural or political power that strike home — such as that on the Marriott hotel in Islamabad last year or this week’s spectacular daylight raid on the cricketers — that shock and stun.
Sehr, who recently left New York to return to Lahore, said the sense of danger was now more imminent than before.
“Now that I've come back, everyone is talking about how they want to leave,” she said. “My parents say things aren’t that bad, that there’s always been instability. They hark back to the war in 1971 or General Zia's era, and say things aren’t so bad. Pakistan has survived for 61 years so it' ll keep on surviving, they say. [But] I feel anxious, to be honest.”
The international community is equally worried about the economy and internal political stability. The recent US$7.6 billion IMF bailout has provided some temporary relief, but grave structural problems remain unaddressed.
“The IMF agreement is first aid, but not a solution,” said Kaiser Bengali, a respected Pakistani economist. “The coming 12 months will be particularly bad. Our banks are barely integrated into the global system, so the crisis hasn't hit us yet. But half our exports go to the European Union or America, and we are looking at mass lay-offs. The textile industry is already devastated.”
Pakistan's economic development over recent decades has been uneven, with the Punjab, with Lahore as its capital, far outstripping the rest of the country. The economic downturn will have massive political and social consequences.
“The central Punjab now has a developed industrial base and a strong middle class. A huge divide has emerged, which is reflected in current political battle lines,” Bengali said.
Last week saw the first major skirmishes in what is likely to be a vicious, long and destabilizing contest between opposition leader Nawaz Sharif, whose Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) faction’s power base is the industrial and commercial middle classes of the Punjab, and the ruling Pakistan People’s Party and Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari, the husband of slain leader Benazir Bhutto, whose support is drawn from poorer and more rural provinces.
A truce that started before the relatively free and fair elections of last year has long broken down and senior Sharif loyalists now believe the time is right to capitalize on their leader's popularity, proved in repeated polls. The first shots in this new struggle came when the highly politicized supreme court barred Sharif and his brother from office, in effect imposing direct administrative rule on the Punjab. Sharif is to use scheduled massive demonstrations by lawyers this week to pressure the government as negotiations between the rivals get under way. Many expect street violence and huge disruption.
Lawyers have long been demanding that Zardari rescind the draconian orders firing senior judges issued by former Pakistani president General Pervez Musharaf.
“This so-called democratic government hasn’t lived up to its promises. The government is afraid of what an independent supreme court might do,” said Munir Malik, a senior lawyer and leader of the movement. “We will march on the capital to demand the rule of law and the Constitution.”
The international community is also disappointed by the apparent inefficiency of Zardari's government. The alternatives, however, are unappealing. Sharif's popularity is in part based on his social and religious conservatism, a far more authentic expression of the views and identity of most Pakistanis than the views and lifestyle of the much more Westernized, secular Zardari. Sharif is increasingly viewed as the man most likely to be able to bring a measure of stability to the country’s chaotic politics. US and UK diplomats have thus made explicit efforts to build links to the Sharif camp.
“Pragmatism is the order of the day,” one UK diplomat said.
Even the recent violence in Lahore has become politicized. As a small band of flag-waving, slogan chanting PML-N supporters drove round the memorial at the attack site on Friday, many locals waved in support. Hadayatullah, a juice-shop owner, blames Zardari and embattled Punjab Governor Salman Taseer, running the province now that the Sharif brothers have been barred from power. There are charges that the chaos following the ouster of the local provincial government led to security lapses.
The hunt for the killers is still going on. Early clues point to outlawed militant groups such as Laskhar-e-Toiba (LeT) and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, both of which have links to security services and have carried out such “raids” in the past. LeT members are prime suspects for November's spectacular assault in Mumbai. However a spokesman denied involvement in last week's attack. Saturday’s investigators in Lahore said that the most likely thesis was “one of our home-grown groups with a possible al-Qaeda link.”
Though authorities say they have now identified the attackers, they have released scant details beyond sketches. All that is currently known is that militants melted into the huge and sprawling city after the attack. It may be some time before they are caught — if ever.
At midnight, the last remaining stragglers are saying good-bye to their friends outside Lahore’s Al-Hamra Theater complex, a local landmark, having enjoyed a local Punjabi language commercial drama, A Nest of Sparrows.
The theater is known for plays ranging from high-brow Urdu classics such as Toba Tek Singh and Hotel Mohenjedaro to Punjabi stage dramas full of raucous humor and suggestive dance moves popular with the working class. Recently, female dancers were ordered to cover up and theater timings were shifted to earlier in the evening in an effort to encourage more families to attend and to preempt criticism from religious extremists. The measures did not prevent bombs going off at two theaters last month.
Irfan, a parking attendant at the theater, said the violence was bad for business.
“We don't get paid our salaries on time anymore; it's hard to pay the rent now,” he said.
His monthly wages come to 6,000 rupees (US$75), a quarter of which goes toward renting a cramped apartment. Irfan said that, since Lahore's theaters changed their timings, the number of customers has declined to almost a third.
“Earlier, at 2am we'd have 200 bikes and cars parked here. Now, we have 40 people on a good night,” he said.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence