Ma blind to ECFA danger
There is a general rule for the political leaders of this world — self interest.
Without self-interest, negotiations cannot be settled, as both sides must feel they have somehow benefited from interaction with the other side. All over the world, it appears, however, that the public’s desires are considered last, even when a minority of people support a government’s egocentric plans, just as those who voted for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) last year — naively, greedily or as a result of manipulation from the media.
People are easily manipulated into believing that they will benefit from these government agendas. US President Barack Obama promised change, just as Ma did with his 6-3-3 agenda. They used attractive campaign slogans to win votes. For those reasons, they both won the presidencies. But why has the approval rate of both leaders dropped so quickly? Obama at least has tried to maintain people’s trust in him, but Ma plays the game inside a closed box with a phone to tell his Cabinet what to do next.
“Anti-war” Obama is now moving the focus away from Iraq toward Pakistan. So the war continues — but on another turf. Similarly, Ma’s “no” promise about unification with China is also crumbling, as have most of the other promises he made.
During an economic crisis, people want governments to do whatever it takes to end the pain. While many developed countries are bailing out those who caused the economic crisis, Ma is using his close relationship with the People’s Republic of China as an excuse to improve Taiwan’s economy by emphasizing the importance of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA), whose content remains a mystery.
Should the people fall for it? Will things really improve for Taiwan with this agreement? Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) letter to the Taipei Times (Letters, March 1, page 8) is more convincing than Ma’s repetitive words about why he feels the ECFA is better. Tsai gave more than 10 reasons why an ECFA would have disastrous consequences for Taiwan, while Ma cannot even give half that many reasons as to why it would be beneficial.
ALEX RAYMOND
Niaosong, Kaohsiung County
Prosecute kitten ‘sadist’
If National Taiwan University believes that the student who is suspected of skinning kittens he adopted and throwing them off buildings is responsible, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law — for the sake of animals and the community as a whole (“University vows to probe abuse, deaths of kittens,” Feb. 25, page 2).
People who think that making animals suffer is “fun” need immediate intervention to prevent their violence from escalating. Animal abusers are cowards who take their issues out on “easy victims” — often including members of their own species. Psychiatrists, criminal profilers and law enforcement officials have repeatedly documented that young people who are cruel to animals often turn that violence against humans. The standard diagnostic and treatment manual for conduct disorders also lists cruelty to animals as a criterion for diagnosis.
People who hurt animals need prison time, counseling and a ban on contact with animals to prevent their sadism from continuing.
JASON BAKER
Hong Kong
228 bias? Think again
I was shocked to learn that a group of so-called “academic historians” has accused the 228 Memorial Foundation of being biased in its interpretation of the 228 Incident (“Academic accuses 228 Foundation of historical bias,” March 1, page 2).
If those historians who are supposed to be experts on Taiwanese history have a non-biased version of the truth, why aren’t they presenting evidence to the public to rebut the so-called biased interpretations agreed upon by academics the world over?
One of the historians even had the nerve to attack former US naval attache George Kerr, claiming that his interpretation of the 228 Incident was the result of Kerr’s support for the independence camp, which sullied the image of the regime of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). What an outlandish accusation!
It is obvious that those so-called expert historians and their diehard KMT cohorts still do not accept the truth, known around the world, that Chiang and former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) terrorized Taiwan for decades and massacred thousands of innocent people who were critical of their rulings.
Taiwanese should be grateful to Kerr, whose eyewitness account of the 228 Incident and the subsequent arrests and execution of Taiwanese is so well presented in his book Formosa Betrayed, which should be required reading for every college student.
In his book, Kerr wrote that a prominent person told him “he had witnessed the notorious ‘Rape of Nanking’ by the Japanese in 1937, but that this [rape of Formosa] surpassed it, for the Nanking Rape was a product of war, a wild outburst of wartime passion, whereas this was coldly calculated revenge perpetrated by the Nationalist Government upon its own people [in peacetime].”
Despite Ma’s gestures of reconciliation toward 228 victims’ families, the wound of the savage incident will never heal because Ma and his KMT followers continue to exonerate the Chiangs’ crimes by saying they did not do the killing themselves and therefore should not be held accountable.
KRIS LIAO
San Francisco, California
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS