The government’s plan to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China has provoked much controversy. This is just another move in Beijing’s plan to achieve unification through economic means. It intends to use ASEAN Plus One and other regional cooperation pacts to suppress and restrict Taiwan’s international economic space and lure Taiwan so far down the road of economic integration that it cannot escape.
Former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) “no haste, be patient” policy and the former Democratic Progressive Party government’s policy of “active opening and effective management” — later changed to “active management and effective opening” — were aimed at countering Beijing and preventing businesspeople from colluding with pro-China forces to push Taiwan down the road to Chinese domination.
With President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) aim of eventual unification, we are faced with collusion between government and business, both keen to rush into China’s embrace.
China makes no secret of its intention to annex Taiwan. Therefore, the government’s ideology-driven policy of looking to China for Taiwan’s economic prospects will have disastrous results for the country. There is no separation between political and economic concerns in Beijing’s treatment of Taiwan. All its policies are aimed at drawing Taiwan closer until it is entirely under Chinese domination. Some people in Taiwan, however, echo China’s claim that an ECFA should not be seen in a political light, maybe because they are naive or blinded by greed, or maybe because they harbor favor annexation.
The chief culprit obstructing Taiwan from establishing bilateral or multilateral free-trade agreements with other countries is China. The ECFA idea is Beijing’s barely disguised ploy to entice Taiwan into becoming part of China in terms of international trade. To see an ECFA as a way out of Taiwan’s so-called marginalization is, therefore, wishful thinking — unless, of course, its advocates are really intent on surrendering to the other side.
Taiwan has clearly lost more than it has gained on the road from former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) 1980s “three noes” policy of no contact, no compromise and no negotiation with China to today’s growing dependence on China. Taiwan’s economic takeoff in the 1970s and 1980s was achieved by building close relations with the US, Europe and Japan.
Now that Taiwan is actively engaged in exchanges with China, it is putting more of its eggs in one basket, even though China is a backward country.
Production factor price equalization comes into play whenever an advanced economy integrates with a less-developed one. While individual business owners may profit from lower costs and a bigger scale of production, the process obstructs the upgrading of production technology and business standards. The economy of the more advanced country is weakened and workers either find themselves out of a job or see real wages decline.
Taiwan has recently seen the greatest ever fall in real wages. Clearly, Taiwan’s steps toward integration with China have done it great harm.
Disregarding these economic realities, the government remains determined to sign an ECFA. Worse, it wants to do so without going through the proper process of explaining the issues to the public, allowing open debate and forming a consensus. It wants to push the agreement through and have the legislature act as a mere rubber stamp.
If the public lets the government have its way, we will be headed toward becoming just another part of China, our lives at the whim of its despotic rulers.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS