The government’s plan to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China has provoked much controversy. This is just another move in Beijing’s plan to achieve unification through economic means. It intends to use ASEAN Plus One and other regional cooperation pacts to suppress and restrict Taiwan’s international economic space and lure Taiwan so far down the road of economic integration that it cannot escape.
Former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) “no haste, be patient” policy and the former Democratic Progressive Party government’s policy of “active opening and effective management” — later changed to “active management and effective opening” — were aimed at countering Beijing and preventing businesspeople from colluding with pro-China forces to push Taiwan down the road to Chinese domination.
With President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) aim of eventual unification, we are faced with collusion between government and business, both keen to rush into China’s embrace.
China makes no secret of its intention to annex Taiwan. Therefore, the government’s ideology-driven policy of looking to China for Taiwan’s economic prospects will have disastrous results for the country. There is no separation between political and economic concerns in Beijing’s treatment of Taiwan. All its policies are aimed at drawing Taiwan closer until it is entirely under Chinese domination. Some people in Taiwan, however, echo China’s claim that an ECFA should not be seen in a political light, maybe because they are naive or blinded by greed, or maybe because they harbor favor annexation.
The chief culprit obstructing Taiwan from establishing bilateral or multilateral free-trade agreements with other countries is China. The ECFA idea is Beijing’s barely disguised ploy to entice Taiwan into becoming part of China in terms of international trade. To see an ECFA as a way out of Taiwan’s so-called marginalization is, therefore, wishful thinking — unless, of course, its advocates are really intent on surrendering to the other side.
Taiwan has clearly lost more than it has gained on the road from former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) 1980s “three noes” policy of no contact, no compromise and no negotiation with China to today’s growing dependence on China. Taiwan’s economic takeoff in the 1970s and 1980s was achieved by building close relations with the US, Europe and Japan.
Now that Taiwan is actively engaged in exchanges with China, it is putting more of its eggs in one basket, even though China is a backward country.
Production factor price equalization comes into play whenever an advanced economy integrates with a less-developed one. While individual business owners may profit from lower costs and a bigger scale of production, the process obstructs the upgrading of production technology and business standards. The economy of the more advanced country is weakened and workers either find themselves out of a job or see real wages decline.
Taiwan has recently seen the greatest ever fall in real wages. Clearly, Taiwan’s steps toward integration with China have done it great harm.
Disregarding these economic realities, the government remains determined to sign an ECFA. Worse, it wants to do so without going through the proper process of explaining the issues to the public, allowing open debate and forming a consensus. It wants to push the agreement through and have the legislature act as a mere rubber stamp.
If the public lets the government have its way, we will be headed toward becoming just another part of China, our lives at the whim of its despotic rulers.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS