Retired postal worker Maria Kozyrenko is a new citizen of Russia — along with 135,000 others in Trans-Dniester alone.
Kozyrenko hasn’t lived in Russia since the Soviet era, but she got her passport two years ago as part of the Kremlin’s push to grant citizenship to hundreds of thousands of ethnic Russians living in former Soviet countries, including Georgia, Moldova, Estonia and Ukraine.
“All our hopes are with Russia,” said Kozyrenko, as she hawked an old black coat at a flea market in Tiraspol, the capital of Trans-Dniester. “We hope that Russia will protect us.”
Russia has given passports to nearly 2.9 million former Soviet citizens since 2000, the Federal Migration Service says. It does not break down the numbers between those who returned to Russia and those who live abroad.
Some fear Moscow will use its growing expatriate communities to meddle in the domestic politics of countries near its borders, or — as in the case of Georgia — as an excuse for military intervention.
But the Kremlin says it is granting passports to Russians abroad for humanitarian rather than political reasons, to help Russians trapped in other countries after the breakup of the Soviet Union.
Spokesman Alexei Sazonov said Western countries, such as Belgium, have conducted similar campaigns in the past.
“We have a non-confrontational foreign policy — we don’t need any conflicts,” Sazonov said. “At the same time, to defend the rights of compatriots is a right countries have.”
The creation of communities of Russian citizens is already undermining Ukraine’s entry into NATO and weakening Moldova as it looks to Europe. It also lets the West know that Russia wants to be reckoned with in what it considers its sphere of influence.
“This is a warning, a serious reminder that there are grounds for concern for those who don’t recognize Russia’s interests,” said Masha Lipman, an analyst with the Carnegie Moscow Center.
For example, in recent years, the Kremlin has handed out tens of thousands of passports in the breakaway Georgian regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. It then justified its military incursion into Georgia last year in part by saying it was protecting Russians living abroad. Now, both South Ossetia and Abkhazia have strengthened political, economic and military ties with Moscow.
Similarly, the Kremlin subsidizes Moldova’s separatist province of Trans-Dniester with cheap gas, funds pro-Russian youth movements and pays poor pensioners a monthly US$10 addition to their pensions of US$60 to US$70.
“For Trans-Dniester, Russia is like the closest and dearest person — it’s like our motherland,” said Alyona Arshinova, 23, a new Russian citizen and activist with a youth group sponsored by pro-Kremlin lawmakers in Russia.
Posters of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin adorn her college dormitory room.
About one-fourth of Trans-Dniester’s 550,000 people have already received Russian citizenship. And Trans-Dniester President Igor Smirnov, who has ruled this sliver of land since 1991, makes no secret that he wants the region to become part of Russia, even though the two don’t share a border.
Another flash point is Estonia, a tiny Baltic nation of 1.3 million that prides itself on its tech-savvy population and efficiency. The Russian embassy in Tallinn said about 3,700 passports were issued in the 12 months before Oct. 30 — more than three times the number during the same period a year earlier.
This is partly because Estonia, a member of the EU and NATO, has made clear it’s nervous about its large ethnic Russian population. Denied automatic citizenship after Estonia’s independence in 1991, many of these Russians are so-called “noncitizens” who must pass a language exam before receiving an Estonian passport.
A lot don’t bother, because of the time and expense of studying the grammatically complex Estonian language. For them, a Russian passport is just as enticing, if not more so. Immigration numbers show more than 96,200 Russian citizens and 111,700 noncitizens living in Estonia.
Residents of Narva, a predominantly ethnic Russian city in northeastern Estonia, said that if they hold a Russian passport and an Estonian noncitizen’s passport, they can travel from Lisbon, Portugal, to Vladivostok without a visa.
“I finally made up my mind — I’m going to get Russian citizenship,” said Vitaly Shkola, 47, an Estonian noncitizen.
Russians with Estonian passports are considered “second-class citizens,” he said.
For some the choice of citizenship boils down to economics.
Vasily Kaidalov, 21, applied for a Russian passport because he can earn more working in Russia than in his destitute hometown.
In Ukraine, a country of 46 million people the size of France, officials claim Russia is rapidly distributing passports in the Crimea Peninsula, the location of a major Russian naval base. The Crimea was long a jewel in the Russian imperial crown, but was given to Ukraine by Nikita Khrushchev in the 1950s. Many influential Russian politicians, such as Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov, believe Khrushchev’s decision was illegal and Russia is duty-bound to repossess Crimea.
Mustafa Dzhemilev, a member of Ukraine’s parliament from the peninsula, estimated that about 200,000 people — or nearly every 10th resident — has dual Russian-Ukrainian citizenship, although it is prohibited by law.
In Ukraine Russia is “trying to do the same thing they did with Abkhazia and South Ossetia: establish legal grounds, at least in the Russian legal system, for intervention — whether that be economic, political or military,” said Peter Zeihan, vice president of analysis at Stratfor, an international intelligence and analysis company.
Many remain convinced that Russia’s true motive in handing out passports outside its borders has to do with politics and power.
“If there are some 200,000 Russian citizens living in Estonia, Russia will have the basis to intervene,” said Sergei Stepanov, an ethnic Russian resident of Narva and noncitizen. “Who will stop them?”
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS