The Taiwan Citizen Conference on National Affairs was a prime opportunity for the government and opposition to work together to find a way to salvage Taiwan’s sinking economy, yet President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) decided at the last minute not to attend the opposition-sponsored event. Instead he called an emergency meeting of his Cabinet ministers and economic officials. It was yet another case of politics over pragmatism, as the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) each did their own thing on Saturday. Political standoffs and grandstanding, however, are the last things Taiwan needs right now.
Of course Ma was not duty bound to attend the conference, but his presence would have gone a long way toward easing political tensions. He could have met DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), heard the opposition’s ideas about political and economic issues and exchanged opinions with academics. Regrettably, Ma is not quite that noble. He blamed his absence from the conference on the poor political atmosphere in the wake of DPP legislators’ disruption of Premier Liu Chao-shiuan’s (劉兆玄) report to the legislature on Friday.
Of course, had Ma gone to the conference, it could have turned into a forum for denouncing his government’s policies, which would have been embarrassing for him and the KMT. Nevertheless, such a meeting would have given Cabinet ministers and KMT legislators a prime chance to defend government policy. Heated debate between government and opposition could have generated new ideas and alternative strategies. Surely that would be better than the parallel universe events that took place — Cabinet members racking their brains in the presidential office and coming up with the same old tired cliches, and a crowd of opposition figures mouthing off at their conference, their vehemence matched only by their impotence to affect economic policy.
Ma’s absence from the conference highlights the complete lack of trust between the government and opposition. The public would like to see Ma and Tsai talk face to face, but such a meeting remains a distant prospect, unlike his government’s burning desire for more talks with their opposites in Beijing.
Despite the 1,500 Chinese missiles pointed at Taiwan, Beijing’s insistence on its “one China” principle and its refusal to recognize Taiwan’s sovereignty or Ma’s status as president, the Ma administration has been in constant communication and consultation with the authorities in Beijing. But Ma refused to meet Tsai at a venue about 1km from his office. How absurd.
Whether the conclusions of the Taiwan Citizen Conference on National Affairs would become part of the government’s policies was not important as the symbolic opportunity the conference provided for Ma and Tsai, who are both rational people, to meet.
Such a meeting could have marked the start of a new and relatively harmonious period in Taiwanese politics, so what was the harm in trying? But it looks like the KMT prefers that politicians continue to waste their time and energy on infighting, even though everyone stands to lose. Ultimately, Ma must be held responsible for the continuing Cold War that divides the pan-blues and pan-greens.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS