The commander of US forces in Asia, Admiral Timothy Keating, speaking in Hong Kong this week, said he had reason to believe that Beijing was ready to revive discussions of military exchanges with the US.
Pressed by news correspondents gathered at the US consulate to explain why he thought so, Keating was reluctant to provide details, but said “we are not living in a void.”
He said there had been “indirect but unmistakable forms of communication” through third parties, including visitors to his headquarters in Hawaii, indicating that the Chinese were open to negotiation.
Backed symbolically by the US aircraft carrier John Stennis anchored for a port visit, Keating also met informally with senior officers of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in garrison in Hong Kong.
The admiral said an initiative was under way to forge an agreement intended to prevent hostile incidents between the US and Chinese warships at sea. The US and the Soviet Union had an agreement during the Cold War that each navy would not train its guns on the other’s warships or fly fighters over each other’s ships. Keating said the new effort was in its earliest stages.
Sino-US military exchanges, which expanded in fits and starts for more than a decade, were abruptly broken off by the Chinese in October after the US announced that it would sell US$6.5 billion in arms to Taiwan. US policy under the Taiwan Relations Act is to provide Taiwan with arms to defend itself.
The impasse appeared to have been broken when US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on the eve of her trip to Asia that the US and China “will resume mid-level military-to-military discussions later this month.”
Clinton’s disclosure caused mild surprise in the Pentagon and at the Pacific Command in Hawaii, where defense officials wondered why such an announcement had not come from Secretary of Defense Robert Gates or Keating, who is responsible for military exchanges with the Chinese. One official shrugged it off as a “rookie mistake” from an administration still getting its feet on the ground.
Keating argued vigorously for a resumption of military dialogue with China, asserting that it would be “very much in our mutual benefit” and would lessen the chances of a confrontation degenerating into a crisis or even into armed conflict.
On a trip through Thailand, Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea, Keating recalled that a Chinese officer had once suggested that the US and China divide the Pacific Ocean, with China responsible for keeping the peace west of Hawaii while the US was confined to the waters east of Hawaii. Keating said “no thanks.”
Instead, the admiral said, the US and China “should work more together.”
He said three Chinese warships had been patrolling in the Gulf of Aden against pirates. Chinese ship captains often communicated with the commander of a US naval task force in that region, he said.
On the other hand, Keating said, the US and China had a “hotline” for communication and he had used it when the US delivered relief supplies to China after a devastating earthquake.
But, he said, “I don’t have a phone number yet” to call a Chinese officer directly.
Responding to fresh reports that China sought to build four aircraft carriers over the next quarter century, Keating was skeptical.
“It’s not as easy as it looks,” said the naval aviator with 5,000 hours of flight time and 1,200 landings aboard aircraft carriers. “Operating an aircraft carrier is a very demanding discipline.”
“It will take them a long time,” he said, “and it will be harder than they think.”
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer in Honolulu.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS