The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) grip on executive and legislative power may have rearranged the political landscape, but there is one thing that persists even after President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) comfortable election victory last year, and that is the remarkable lack of leadership potential in the party.
With cross-strait affairs dominated by old-guard hardliners such as former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and the most visible of KMT legislators continuing to trade in defamation, rumor-mongering and the lamest of banalities, there is precious little genuine talent on show in national politics.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has its own problems, of course. The top concern for the party should not so much be its depleted legislative caucus as the quality of the remaining legislators.
Recent decades have shown that the next generation of leaders in both parties requires “blooding” in the form of management of a major city or county government. Recent elections, for example, saw DPP headquarters fail to give its brightest stars enough support on the ground to start them along this track. Consequently, some of the DPP’s best performers are languishing in compensatory party posts with worsening prospects of reentering electoral politics.
The KMT need not be so concerned for the moment about internal challenges to its leadership, given that the focus on cross-strait detente will continue to maintain Lien and other hardliners’ influence at party headquarters.
The leadership of President Ma, as weak as it appears, is rendered less vulnerable by a lack of candidates who can appeal to a wide range of grassroots KMT members and the general public. If Ma can learn to present more spine — especially on economic matters as the global gloom worsens — he should be able to withstand any party challenger that might emerge before the next election.
In the longer term, Taoyuan County Commissioner Chu Li-lun (朱立倫) is an attractive candidate who appeals to a broader range of voters.
Also of interest, however, is KMT Legislator and caucus deputy secretary-general Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾), who is shaping up as a rare commodity for the KMT.
She is willing and able to speak up on contentious matters with a reasoned and moderate stance, and in so doing can increase her credibility among voters on both sides of the divide.
Lo is the first accountant to be elected to the legislature, and has adeptly attacked wasteful use of resources by the executive, supported humanitarian visas for Tibetans and others and taken a surprising line that acknowledges the ongoing anger of victims of the 228 Incident.
While her association with the People First Party (PFP) and participation in the cult-like anti-Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) “red shirt” rallies do not lend her credibility, in key moments of legislative activity she has exhibited leadership potential rather than spew bile, muck-rake or act as a party automaton.
It will be interesting to see where her political career takes her, and indeed whether her PFP background can withstand some of her colleagues’ resentment, which has already begun to materialize.
This is certain, however: Lo’s late entry into politics, professional expertise and PFP background will help to open up debate within the KMT as it struggles to convince skeptics that it respects diversity and dissenting voices.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS