The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) grip on executive and legislative power may have rearranged the political landscape, but there is one thing that persists even after President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) comfortable election victory last year, and that is the remarkable lack of leadership potential in the party.
With cross-strait affairs dominated by old-guard hardliners such as former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and the most visible of KMT legislators continuing to trade in defamation, rumor-mongering and the lamest of banalities, there is precious little genuine talent on show in national politics.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has its own problems, of course. The top concern for the party should not so much be its depleted legislative caucus as the quality of the remaining legislators.
Recent decades have shown that the next generation of leaders in both parties requires “blooding” in the form of management of a major city or county government. Recent elections, for example, saw DPP headquarters fail to give its brightest stars enough support on the ground to start them along this track. Consequently, some of the DPP’s best performers are languishing in compensatory party posts with worsening prospects of reentering electoral politics.
The KMT need not be so concerned for the moment about internal challenges to its leadership, given that the focus on cross-strait detente will continue to maintain Lien and other hardliners’ influence at party headquarters.
The leadership of President Ma, as weak as it appears, is rendered less vulnerable by a lack of candidates who can appeal to a wide range of grassroots KMT members and the general public. If Ma can learn to present more spine — especially on economic matters as the global gloom worsens — he should be able to withstand any party challenger that might emerge before the next election.
In the longer term, Taoyuan County Commissioner Chu Li-lun (朱立倫) is an attractive candidate who appeals to a broader range of voters.
Also of interest, however, is KMT Legislator and caucus deputy secretary-general Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾), who is shaping up as a rare commodity for the KMT.
She is willing and able to speak up on contentious matters with a reasoned and moderate stance, and in so doing can increase her credibility among voters on both sides of the divide.
Lo is the first accountant to be elected to the legislature, and has adeptly attacked wasteful use of resources by the executive, supported humanitarian visas for Tibetans and others and taken a surprising line that acknowledges the ongoing anger of victims of the 228 Incident.
While her association with the People First Party (PFP) and participation in the cult-like anti-Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) “red shirt” rallies do not lend her credibility, in key moments of legislative activity she has exhibited leadership potential rather than spew bile, muck-rake or act as a party automaton.
It will be interesting to see where her political career takes her, and indeed whether her PFP background can withstand some of her colleagues’ resentment, which has already begun to materialize.
This is certain, however: Lo’s late entry into politics, professional expertise and PFP background will help to open up debate within the KMT as it struggles to convince skeptics that it respects diversity and dissenting voices.
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
China’s partnership with Pakistan has long served as a key instrument in Beijing’s efforts to unsettle India. While official narratives frame the two nations’ alliance as one of economic cooperation and regional stability, the underlying strategy suggests a deliberate attempt to check India’s rise through military, economic and diplomatic maneuvering. China’s growing influence in Pakistan is deeply intertwined with its own global ambitions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative, offers China direct access to the Arabian Sea, bypassing potentially vulnerable trade routes. For Pakistan, these investments provide critical infrastructure, yet they also
RSS