What a welcome relief it must have been for the thousands of Taiwanese who travel to the UK each year when the British Trade and Cultural Office announced on Monday that, from March 3, Taiwanese would no longer require a visa for short-term visits.
The news will put an end to the extremely laborious and expensive process of applying for a visa that must have put many a person off visiting the UK in the past.
The question that many people must be asking now is, if the UK can include Taiwan in its visa-waiver program, then why can’t the US?
Taipei has been pushing hard for many years for inclusion in the US program and, as has been noted time and again, Taiwan meets all the criteria, including a low rate of visa rejection of around 3 percent — the threshold for qualification is less than 10 percent.
Indeed, the recent implementation of e-passports means Taiwan is more than qualified to be part of the US program, yet Washington refuses to budge on the issue.
The US State Department’s Web site says that even if a nation meets all the criteria, “designation as a [visa waiver program] country is at the discretion of the US government.”
Like the US’ refusal to discuss a free trade agreement with Taiwan, Washington’s continued rejection of Taipei’s advances on the visa issue has led some to speculate that China is the problem. However, the fact that the UK and many other countries that have close relations with Beijing, such as Japan, grant Taiwanese landing visas would suggest that this isn’t the case.
So what exactly is Washington’s beef?
Maybe Taiwan’s refusal to fully reopen its markets to imports of US beef is the source of the problem, as it is obviously a big bone of contention for many in the US. This was evident once again this week when the Taiwanese government found itself under pressure from American Institute in Taiwan Director Stephen Young, as well as the president of the influential American Enterprise Institute think tank.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has said that the US has suspended talks on all Taiwan-US trade issues until the beef dilemma is resolved. If that is the case, then instead of procrastinating any longer, the ministry and the government should take the opportunity to turn the tables on the US and offer to open our market to US beef in return for inclusion in the visa waiver program. This is the kind of language Washington understands and would certainly create a “win-win” situation — to use the popular phrase.
Young, as the US’ main messenger on this issue, has repeatedly stated that Taiwan should make a “science-based” decision regarding imports of US beef. Well, it is time for the US to make a “fact-based” decision on allowing Taiwanese into the US.
If the UK government believes Taipei is trustworthy enough to tackle the problem of Chinese using forged Taiwanese documents to illegally enter its territory, then there is no reason why the US can’t do the same.
It is time to call Washington’s bluff on this long-delayed issue.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS