Since last month, eight people are known to have been infected with the H5N1 strain of the avian influenza virus, of whom five have died. Strangely, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization has received no reports of H5N1 infection in birds from the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture. It could be that the Chinese government is hiding information about infections among poultry.
If that is the case, sporadic cases of people infected with bird flu in various provinces of China may only be the tip of the iceberg.
Since children of poultry raisers are most susceptible to bird flu infection and the death rate for avian influenza is more than 50 percent, failure to divulge the true situation would hamper preventive efforts and put children’s lives at risk.
Recently, 21 dead birds were found washed ashore on Hong Kong’s Lantau Island. The birds were believed to have come from the Pearl River Delta — the origin of H5N1 avian influenza — which has the highest density of poultry farming in the world.
The fact that three of the birds have tested positive for H5N1 tends to confirm suspicions that China is hiding information about bird flu cases.
In 2005, Jeffery Taubenberger, chair of the Department of Molecular Pathology at the US Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, published the genome of the 1918 pandemic strain of H1N1 in the scientific journal Nature. The strain was confirmed to be a genetic mutation of an avian influenza virus that crossed over into humans and spread rapidly, and was 50 times to 39,000 times more toxic than the original strain.
The following year, Taubenberger published a chart showing mass deaths of birds infected with the avian influenza virus in 1916 in Emerging Infectious Diseases, a journal of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Considering this historical pattern, the appearance of dead birds on the shore of Lantau Island should be taken as a serious warning.
The influenza epidemic of 1918 coincided with the end of World War I.
Last year saw a string of disasters in China — blizzards, the Sichuan earthquake and a drought in its northern provinces. Could it be that natural and man-made calamities are setting the scene for a bird flu epidemic?
Another cause for concern is that outbreaks of new strains of human influenza have occurred in cycles, at intervals of between 10 and 40 years.
If this pattern is any indication, another outbreak could be expected soon.
Up until now, H5N1 bird flu has infected mainly children and young people under 20 years old. Figures published by the US magazine Annals of Internal Medicine in 1987 show that, among all historical outbreaks of new flu strains, only in the 1918 human H5N1 flu pandemic were the majority of those infected adults aged between 20 and 40.
Other human flu outbreaks have affected mostly elderly people aged 65 and above.
If H1N1 infection among humans starts moving into the 20 to 40-year-old age group, the alarm bells should start ringing.
Experts at the US CDC think that if mortality among those infected with H5N1 falls below 2.5 percent and the infection rate rises over 25 percent, it will show that the H5N1 virus has shifted from attacking α2,3 sialic acid-containing receptors in the lower respiratory tract — as discovered by Mikhail Matrosovich and others in 2005 — to new infection sites in the upper respiratory tract, from where, after replicating itself in vast numbers, it can spread easily via airborne droplets. This would make the virus more infectious.
Research published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that during the past two years, resistance of H1N1 and H5N1 to the drug Oseltamivir — marketed as Tamiflu — has increased sharply, indicating that the H5N1 bird flu virus has mutated and adapted. These scientific data suggest that a nightmare — the outbreak of a new flu strain among humans — will soon be upon us.
China may be able to conceal the spread of H5N1 from public view, but people in Taiwan, being such close neighbors of China, cannot afford to ignore the approaching nightmare, because H5N1 bird flu can cross national borders at any time.
Mayo Kuo is a Taiwan-based pediatrician. His elder brother Max Kuo is a US-based pediatrician.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG AND JULIAN CLEGG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS