Since taking office in May, obtaining observer status for Taiwan at the World Health Assembly (WHA) has been trumpeted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government as a top diplomatic task and a barometer of cross-strait relations. The nation’s bid this year, if successful, would indicate “goodwill” from China, the KMT government has said, apprently hoping for a positive outcome at the WHA session this May amid ostensibly warming cross-strait relations.
While the government’s efforts in that regard should be acknowledged, there is, however, more here than meets the eye and failure to scrutinize the deal could have serious long-term implications for the nation’s sovereignty.
There is no such thing as WHA “observer status” in the WHO Constitution. The so-called WHA observership appears in the WHO’s Rules of Procedure. According to Rule 47 of the Rules of the Procedure of the WHA, “Observers of invited non-Member States and territories on whose behalf application for associate membership has been made may attend any open meetings of the Health Assembly or any of its main committees. They may, upon the invitation of the President, and with the consent of the Health Assembly or committee, make a statement on the subject under discussions.”
In other words, as long as China is in a good mood, a nod from Beijing would enable Taiwan to attend a WHA session as an observer. One detail that is often overlooked, however, is that observer status is a one-time event, meaning that even if Taiwan were granted the status this year, there is no guarantee it would be allowed in the following year. Everything, therefore, hinges on whether Beijing opposes the measure at a given time.
The question is, therefore: How much is Taiwan willing to demean itself if Chinese “goodwill” means having to beg, year after year, for crumbs from Beijing?
The implications for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) ability to act as head of state are severe, as he could find himself having to give a little more to China each year to be allowed into the WHA. In such a scenario, the great diplomatic accomplishment would be nothing more than abdication, turning the nation into a beggar and, by contrast, Beijing into a gatekeeper.
To avoid giving the international community the impression that Taiwan is nothing more than a pawn of China — or part of it — Taipei must continue seeking full membership at the WHO, as was done under the previous administration.
It is one thing to compromise as part of a strategy to gain international space. But any compromise must not cross the line into threatening or eroding the nation’s sovereignty.
Without sovereignty, there is simply no international space. If Taiwan is to forsake its national dignity in seeking an international presence, it might as well declare itself part of China, in which case international recognition would be a moot point.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS