Taiwan is a country, and it thirsts to become a normal and advanced democracy, regardless of what its national title may be. Such a national consciousness is the common aspiration of most people in Taiwan.
Faced with the Chinese Communist Party’s “one China” united front strategy, which is echoed by pro-unification forces within Taiwan, people may differ on how to achieve this aspiration, even to the extent of serious disputes and confrontation. Some go so far as demanding that others unite around their particular opinion and denigrating those who decline to do so.
Such an attitude not only oppresses others right to free expression, but also weakens the movement, raising the specter of Taiwan’s final defeat.
What is needed is a pragmatic and feasible fundamental principle that is acceptable to all.
As Taiwanese democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) said, “Compatriots must unite, for unity is strength.”
Strengthening and expanding Taiwan’s national consciousness is the most basic way to prevent annexation by China. However, efforts to consolidate national consciousness can be legitimate and convincing only when they are associated with people or things that uphold justice and ethics.
So our fundamental principle is that “the words and deeds of any person or party should be tolerated, respected and supported as long as they uphold Taiwanese national consciousness and comply with justice and ethics. That is the way to attract the public to identify with Taiwan as a country.”
Within this scope, nobody should publicly attack or judge others based on their personal preferences, lest they create divisions that could be used by the pro-unification camp. Anyone who insists on doing so may be suspected of fomenting personal or factional struggles. Which way is best can be seen from the extent to which it extends the public’s identification with Taiwan as a country.
We should condemn any word and restrain any deed that runs against either Taiwan’s national consciousness or justice and ethics. After all, Taiwanese national identity is a natural and healthy concept, so there is no need to shy away from it.
Without Taiwanese national identity, justice and ethics are empty words, because if we do not safeguard Taiwan’s status the county will come under the sway of the communists. Such an outcome would endanger our freedom, democracy and human rights, as Taiwan would be amalgamated into China’s society — one in which wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few while the majority live in poverty. What could be more unjust and unethical than that?
If, on the other hand, people or things associated with Taiwanese national consciousness are seen to violate justice and ethics, they may easily be used to defame the whole idea and make it unpopular.
As US President Barack Obama said in his inaugural speech: “Our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.”
Taiwan’s cause is a just one, and ethical conduct is a forceful example. So if we can stick to the basic principles of Taiwanese national consciousness, justice and ethics, while treating others with due tolerance, humility and restraint, we can double and redouble our strength. As long as we work together, Taiwan will surely win out in the end.
Chang Shyue-yih is a professor in the School of Medicine at National Yang-Ming University and president of Taiwan Society North.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
With polls in as many as 76 countries, 2024 is the biggest election year in history. This year’s raft of elections has already produced a left-leaning government in Britain, political gridlock in France, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s return to office for a third term, and the elevation of the pro-sovereignty William Lai (賴清德) as Taiwan’s president, but with his Democratic Progressive Party losing its majority in the legislature. But no election will have a greater global impact than the one in the US. Whether American voters elect Kamala Harris or Donald Trump as the next president, and whether the Republicans
Minnesota Governor and Democratic US vice presidential candidate Tim Walz has connections to China dating back decades that could help inform US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ approach to the world’s second-biggest economy, but might also spell trouble with leaders in Beijing and Republicans back home. The little-known Minnesota governor taught English in China’s southern Guangdong Province in 1989 and 1990, making him the first person on a presidential ticket to have that kind of experience living in the country since former US president George H.W. Bush, who served as US ambassador in Beijing in the 1970s. Walz
There is an old saying in Chinese that essentially means that when an academic tries to reason with a warrior, they might as well be talking to a wall. Times have changed, and military men are far more reasonable now than when this saying emerged. Retired army general Yu Pei-chen (于北辰) is a good example of this. Today, academics are now often the ones who cannot be reasoned with. Alice Ou (區桂芝), who teaches Chinese Literature at Taipei First Girls’ High School, and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), who is also an associate professor at National Tsing Hua
Last week, the South China Morning Post reported that Chinese academics and strategists have proposed the creation of a “shadow government” for Taiwan. The plan involves setting up a fully prepared administrative body, referred to as the “Central Taiwan Work Committee,” which would be ready to take over in Taiwan immediately upon unification — whether achieved through peaceful means or military action. The proposal emphasizes the committee’s role in swiftly assuming control of the island’s administration if unification were to occur. The proposed committee would handle tasks such as currency conversion and infrastructure integration between Taiwan and China, while also encouraging