Shoes and power
In Chinese politics, there is no space for humorous expression; there is only power space between the dictator and the people ruled.
When a reporter threw a shoe at former US president George W. Bush, he commented that the shoe was size 10. But when someone threw a shoe at Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), Wen’s response was that it was a “dirty trick,” because he has the power to crush such dissent immediately if the incident had happened in China.
A big government like that of the Chinese Communist Party tortures its people, such as rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng (高智晟), who did not even throw a shoe at the country’s leader, but only spoke his mind. And what happened to him? Severe beatings, electric shocks to his genitals and cigarettes held to his eyes. Now he is missing.
Just think what would happen if someone threw a shoe at a Chinese leader. They would disappear from the face of the Earth within seconds.
NI KUO-RONG
Hsingchu City
Where’s Lee’s US passport?
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Diane Lee’s (李慶安) attorney Lee Yung-ran (李永然) has reportedly said that Lee’s taking an oath of allegiance to the Republic of China (ROC) and use of an ROC passport to enter and exit the US since 1994 are concrete acts that prove her intent to relinquish her US citizenship (“AIT’s letters back Diane Lee: lawyer,” Feb. 6, page 4).
But what of her maintaining property in the US? What about her having family members in the US? And what about her being on record as paying what is evidently federal income tax in the US?
According to the Web site of the US Department of State, these are three crucial questions in determining — on a case-by-case basis — if it is a person’s intent to relinquish his or her citizenship. Moreover, there is no documentation that attests to Lee’s renouncing her US nationality. Such documentation is a requisite step in surrendering one’s US citizenship.
It seems to me that another crucial question in this matter is: What is the current official status of Lee’s US passport? Is her passport still valid? Has it lapsed? If so, has she made any effort to renew it? Has she officially relinquished it by turning it in to the relevant US authorities? Has any official US authority divested Lee of her passport — has it been revoked in any way?
Exactly what is the status of her passport?
I pose these questions because holding a valid US passport means that a person is a US citizen. They are equivalent. If a person has a US passport, then he or she is a US citizen or national.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
With polls in as many as 76 countries, 2024 is the biggest election year in history. This year’s raft of elections has already produced a left-leaning government in Britain, political gridlock in France, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s return to office for a third term, and the elevation of the pro-sovereignty William Lai (賴清德) as Taiwan’s president, but with his Democratic Progressive Party losing its majority in the legislature. But no election will have a greater global impact than the one in the US. Whether American voters elect Kamala Harris or Donald Trump as the next president, and whether the Republicans
Minnesota Governor and Democratic US vice presidential candidate Tim Walz has connections to China dating back decades that could help inform US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ approach to the world’s second-biggest economy, but might also spell trouble with leaders in Beijing and Republicans back home. The little-known Minnesota governor taught English in China’s southern Guangdong Province in 1989 and 1990, making him the first person on a presidential ticket to have that kind of experience living in the country since former US president George H.W. Bush, who served as US ambassador in Beijing in the 1970s. Walz
There is an old saying in Chinese that essentially means that when an academic tries to reason with a warrior, they might as well be talking to a wall. Times have changed, and military men are far more reasonable now than when this saying emerged. Retired army general Yu Pei-chen (于北辰) is a good example of this. Today, academics are now often the ones who cannot be reasoned with. Alice Ou (區桂芝), who teaches Chinese Literature at Taipei First Girls’ High School, and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), who is also an associate professor at National Tsing Hua
Last week, the South China Morning Post reported that Chinese academics and strategists have proposed the creation of a “shadow government” for Taiwan. The plan involves setting up a fully prepared administrative body, referred to as the “Central Taiwan Work Committee,” which would be ready to take over in Taiwan immediately upon unification — whether achieved through peaceful means or military action. The proposal emphasizes the committee’s role in swiftly assuming control of the island’s administration if unification were to occur. The proposed committee would handle tasks such as currency conversion and infrastructure integration between Taiwan and China, while also encouraging