Shoes and power
In Chinese politics, there is no space for humorous expression; there is only power space between the dictator and the people ruled.
When a reporter threw a shoe at former US president George W. Bush, he commented that the shoe was size 10. But when someone threw a shoe at Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), Wen’s response was that it was a “dirty trick,” because he has the power to crush such dissent immediately if the incident had happened in China.
A big government like that of the Chinese Communist Party tortures its people, such as rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng (高智晟), who did not even throw a shoe at the country’s leader, but only spoke his mind. And what happened to him? Severe beatings, electric shocks to his genitals and cigarettes held to his eyes. Now he is missing.
Just think what would happen if someone threw a shoe at a Chinese leader. They would disappear from the face of the Earth within seconds.
NI KUO-RONG
Hsingchu City
Where’s Lee’s US passport?
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Diane Lee’s (李慶安) attorney Lee Yung-ran (李永然) has reportedly said that Lee’s taking an oath of allegiance to the Republic of China (ROC) and use of an ROC passport to enter and exit the US since 1994 are concrete acts that prove her intent to relinquish her US citizenship (“AIT’s letters back Diane Lee: lawyer,” Feb. 6, page 4).
But what of her maintaining property in the US? What about her having family members in the US? And what about her being on record as paying what is evidently federal income tax in the US?
According to the Web site of the US Department of State, these are three crucial questions in determining — on a case-by-case basis — if it is a person’s intent to relinquish his or her citizenship. Moreover, there is no documentation that attests to Lee’s renouncing her US nationality. Such documentation is a requisite step in surrendering one’s US citizenship.
It seems to me that another crucial question in this matter is: What is the current official status of Lee’s US passport? Is her passport still valid? Has it lapsed? If so, has she made any effort to renew it? Has she officially relinquished it by turning it in to the relevant US authorities? Has any official US authority divested Lee of her passport — has it been revoked in any way?
Exactly what is the status of her passport?
I pose these questions because holding a valid US passport means that a person is a US citizen. They are equivalent. If a person has a US passport, then he or she is a US citizen or national.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS