Last week, a CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets report said Taiwan’s economy would shrink 11 percent this year, which not only represents a substantial downward revision from the foreign brokerage’s previous forecast of a 2.7 percent contraction, but would also make the nation the worst performer among major economies in Asia.
Taiwan, like its rivals in the region, depends on a prosperous world market for information-technology products and other items that support its economy. It is clear that the global downturn will have an adverse impact on the country.
If CLSA’s projection of an 11 percent GDP contraction materializes, it would be a new low after Taiwan recorded declines of 2.17 percent in 2001 and 1.38 percent in 1974 because of the oil crisis that year.
But, since the forecast is by far the most pessimistic among all predictions made by either local or foreign institutions, it soon raised eyebrows among government officials and economists. The nation’s top economic planner, the Council for Economic Planning and Development — which targets 2.5 percent economic growth for Taiwan this year — criticized the CLSA figure as “exaggerated” and “ridiculous.”
The government’s latest forecast predicted GDP growth would be 2.12 percent this year. Its statistics bureau will disclose the growth figure for the final quarter of last year and its projection for this year on Feb. 19, after it said in November that the economy shrank 1.02 percent from a year earlier in the third quarter, the first contraction since 2003.
Many economists have recently adjusted downward their predictions in response to the deteriorating global downturn. But the great uncertainties about the impact of global financial turmoil have made it even harder than usual for economists to offer accurate forecasts.
Nonetheless, the important issue is not how accurate CLSA’s figure is, but the main reason behind its gloomy forecast: a collapse in the nation’s exports.
People have to face the cruel reality that our economy depends too heavily on exports, which account for about 60 percent to 65 percent of GDP, and it may be a tipping point for the nation to seriously reconsider how to adjust its fundamental economic and financial structures to address Taiwan’s long-term economic development. Second, those who have put their faith in China’s economy should understand that its exports and manufacturing output have continued to fall in recent months, and the global economic slowdown has yet to bottom out.
Obviously, years of investment in China has made Taiwan overly dependent on it, and December’s plunge of 54 percent in shipments to China including Hong Kong, which accounted for about 40 percent of the nation’s exports, should sound alarm bells.
The global slowdown could worsen and lead to a retaliatory trade war among nations, given the development of protectionist tendencies among several governments as a way to combat the economic downturn and rising unemployment at home.
Most of the time, doomsayers are not welcome, even though some of their forecasts have proven true long after they made the remarks. At the end of 2000, when then newly appointed minister of economic affairs Lin Hsin-yi (林信義) said the public needed to be prepared for hardship in 2001, there were few people really paying attention to what had given rise to his warning, and economists maintained their forecasts for 2001’s GDP growth ranging from 4 percent to 6 percent. And what happened? Taiwan saw a GDP contraction of 2.17 percent in 2001, a record decline at the time.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS