The Chinese-language daily China Times recently published in serial form an article by Huang Ching-lung (黃清龍) entitled “Grace and rupture – K.C. Wu [吳國楨] and the two Chiangs.” Huang’s article draws on various sources, including the diaries of former dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) recently made public by the archives of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, files declassified by the US Department of State, and A Biography of K.C. Wu published by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) in 1995. Based on these sources, Huang gives an account of the fierce power struggle that took place between Wu and Chiang in Taiwan in the early 1950s.
The article also mentions that Wu and Chiang’s son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) were as incompatible as fire and water. Huang’s summary with regard to their relationship is that “Chiang Ching-kuo’s methods, modeled as they were on those of the Soviet Communist Party ... were loathsome and completely unacceptable to the western-educated K.C. Wu.”
Henry Liu (劉宜良), who wrote A Biography of Chiang Ching-kuo under the pen name Chiang Nan (江南) was assassinated in the US in 1984. There is a theory that his killing was related to his plan to write a biography of Wu.
Huang says that one of the problems Wu faced following his appointment as governor of Taiwan Province was “interference by the intelligence gathering system headed by Chiang Ching-kuo.” At the time, Chiang was director of the political department of the Ministry of National Defense.
Huang tells us: “He was also in charge of confidential information at the Presidential Office, making him the spymaster in full control of all party and government intelligence networks. With these powers in his hands, Chiang launched the White Terror in Taiwan. Wu was extremely indignant about the way in which secret agents ran amuck and trampled human rights.”
The biggest clash between Wu and Chiang was over the China Youth Anti-communist National Salvation Corps (CYC, 救國團) established by Chiang.
According to Huang, “Wu was of the opinion that the CYC was an unlawful organization modeled on the Communist Youth League. He not only refused to provide funding for the CYC, but even called for it to be abolished. This amounted to a public showdown with Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo.”
In 1953, Wu was dismissed from his post and went to live in the US. From across the sea, he severely criticized the Chiang government, emphasizing among other things the unfettered government spy networks and the establishment of the CYC as a means of exercising thought control over students.
Just like Chiang Kai-shek’s dozens of residences, CYC activity centers quickly mushroomed in scenic spots all over Taiwan. Presented as an organizer of group activity travel for youth and students, the CYC was in reality a shady instrument of thought control for the dictatorship packaged in a bright, sunny image.
In 2007, an investigation by the National Property Administration under the Ministry of Finance (財政部國有財產局) found that the CYC occupied more than 1.8 hectares of state-owned land. In view of this, the Ministry of Education lodged a complaint against the CYC for unjustified expropriation of national property.
In response, Prudence Chou (周祝瑛), in her capacity as chairwoman of the teacher’s association at National Chengchi University, wrote in an emotionally worded open letter to then Ministry of Education secretary-general Chuang Kuo-jung (莊國榮).
She wrote: “As someone born in the 1950s, like me, surely you, too, took part in China Youth Corps activities. Didn’t you travel with them to the mountains and seaside, walk the Central Cross-Island highway or climb Hohuanshan? Didn’t you and your friends sit round the campfire and sing the CYC theme song By Chance (偶然)? Just think how many young people in those days learned to toughen their bodies and spirits by taking part in CYC activities — how they developed a greater love for Taiwan and learned the spirit of sacrifice and teamwork.”
Yes, indeed, the “Republic of China” really did come to Taiwan “by chance.” It was not by chance, however, but by intention that the Chiang regime systematically oppressed the Taiwanese. How many people were trained to “love” the Chinese Nationalist Party’s one-party state in Taiwan and to “sacrifice” themselves for the “great leader?”
Even today, few people question the image of Chiang Ching-kuo as a benevolent ruler, but it is important for Taiwanese to take a second look at him.
Ko Tsi-jin is a magazine staff writer.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of
RSS