The Chinese-language daily China Times recently published in serial form an article by Huang Ching-lung (黃清龍) entitled “Grace and rupture – K.C. Wu [吳國楨] and the two Chiangs.” Huang’s article draws on various sources, including the diaries of former dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) recently made public by the archives of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, files declassified by the US Department of State, and A Biography of K.C. Wu published by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) in 1995. Based on these sources, Huang gives an account of the fierce power struggle that took place between Wu and Chiang in Taiwan in the early 1950s.
The article also mentions that Wu and Chiang’s son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) were as incompatible as fire and water. Huang’s summary with regard to their relationship is that “Chiang Ching-kuo’s methods, modeled as they were on those of the Soviet Communist Party ... were loathsome and completely unacceptable to the western-educated K.C. Wu.”
Henry Liu (劉宜良), who wrote A Biography of Chiang Ching-kuo under the pen name Chiang Nan (江南) was assassinated in the US in 1984. There is a theory that his killing was related to his plan to write a biography of Wu.
Huang says that one of the problems Wu faced following his appointment as governor of Taiwan Province was “interference by the intelligence gathering system headed by Chiang Ching-kuo.” At the time, Chiang was director of the political department of the Ministry of National Defense.
Huang tells us: “He was also in charge of confidential information at the Presidential Office, making him the spymaster in full control of all party and government intelligence networks. With these powers in his hands, Chiang launched the White Terror in Taiwan. Wu was extremely indignant about the way in which secret agents ran amuck and trampled human rights.”
The biggest clash between Wu and Chiang was over the China Youth Anti-communist National Salvation Corps (CYC, 救國團) established by Chiang.
According to Huang, “Wu was of the opinion that the CYC was an unlawful organization modeled on the Communist Youth League. He not only refused to provide funding for the CYC, but even called for it to be abolished. This amounted to a public showdown with Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo.”
In 1953, Wu was dismissed from his post and went to live in the US. From across the sea, he severely criticized the Chiang government, emphasizing among other things the unfettered government spy networks and the establishment of the CYC as a means of exercising thought control over students.
Just like Chiang Kai-shek’s dozens of residences, CYC activity centers quickly mushroomed in scenic spots all over Taiwan. Presented as an organizer of group activity travel for youth and students, the CYC was in reality a shady instrument of thought control for the dictatorship packaged in a bright, sunny image.
In 2007, an investigation by the National Property Administration under the Ministry of Finance (財政部國有財產局) found that the CYC occupied more than 1.8 hectares of state-owned land. In view of this, the Ministry of Education lodged a complaint against the CYC for unjustified expropriation of national property.
In response, Prudence Chou (周祝瑛), in her capacity as chairwoman of the teacher’s association at National Chengchi University, wrote in an emotionally worded open letter to then Ministry of Education secretary-general Chuang Kuo-jung (莊國榮).
She wrote: “As someone born in the 1950s, like me, surely you, too, took part in China Youth Corps activities. Didn’t you travel with them to the mountains and seaside, walk the Central Cross-Island highway or climb Hohuanshan? Didn’t you and your friends sit round the campfire and sing the CYC theme song By Chance (偶然)? Just think how many young people in those days learned to toughen their bodies and spirits by taking part in CYC activities — how they developed a greater love for Taiwan and learned the spirit of sacrifice and teamwork.”
Yes, indeed, the “Republic of China” really did come to Taiwan “by chance.” It was not by chance, however, but by intention that the Chiang regime systematically oppressed the Taiwanese. How many people were trained to “love” the Chinese Nationalist Party’s one-party state in Taiwan and to “sacrifice” themselves for the “great leader?”
Even today, few people question the image of Chiang Ching-kuo as a benevolent ruler, but it is important for Taiwanese to take a second look at him.
Ko Tsi-jin is a magazine staff writer.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS