Justice is dying
The imprisonment of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was like an H-bomb exploding in Taiwan. It divided the country and brought back the nightmare of raucous battling between the pan-blue and pan-green camps. Apparent leaks of the investigation by the judicial authorities to talk show hosts and pan-blue media have fueled public hatred against the previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government.
The decision to throw Chen back in jail after changing judges in the middle of court proceedings was particularly bothersome.
On Jan. 11, several prosecutors directly involved in Chen’s case performed a skit in which a detainee raised her handcuffed hands and shouted “judicial persecution.” The audience, which included Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰), broke into laughter, mocking the former president.
This is no laughing matter. When he was visiting Central America six months ago, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) told media that Chen’s crimes reminded him of former Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos. Many DPP officials were handcuffed and imprisoned even before the nature of their crimes was revealed. Chen was shown no respect as he was handcuffed in the open. After his 32 days in detention and a hunger strike, the court released him.
The prosecutors’ office chose not to challenge the ruling. Within 24 hours, prosecutors changed their minds and filed a protest. The court rejected the appeal and allowed Chen to remain free. This was followed by an avalanche of criticism by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators. The judge who had set Chen free was replaced and the new judge ruled against Chen on the assumption that he could flee the country or coerce his subordinates. He was therefore sent back to prison.
Taiwan was ruled under martial law for about four decades. For the past 20 years under presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen, democracy gained a foothold. Despite harsh criticism from KMT-friendly TV stations and newspapers, Chen vowed he would rather resign as president than shut down one TV station. Taiwan’s press is ranked the freest in Asia and up until now we could expect that courts and prosecutors would respect due process.
With Ma and Wang, however, we see clear and open attempts to interfere with the judiciary. Obedient prosecutors just follow the example set by their superiors. It was unprecedented — and appalling — to see a minister of justice allow such a skit to be held.
There is no excuse for her behavior, even if she defended it by saying it was only for internal amusement.
Justice is dying in Taiwan. What is so disappointing is that too few law professors and teachers have been speaking out. What happened to all the intellectuals and the fair-minded people? Where are you?
One thing is certain, your rights and life will not be protected if there is no justice.
TIEN C. CHENG
Libertyville, Illinois
Conduct unbecoming
Of course prosecutors and even the minister of justice have the right to act or have some fun on “Law Day.” They can choose any subject — Santa Claus or Arabian Nights or anything else, for that matter — to make fun of. But their little “play” about former president Chen Shui-bian went too far.
Behavior of this kind not only raises ethical questions, it also libelous.
It is disheartening to see prosecutors and a minister of justice so openly display their lack of emotional quotient and IQ. They have behaved like clowns — high paid ones at that.
And they don’t even feel ashamed of themselves
Your editorial on Jan. 16, “Making a mockery of justice,” was bang on by criticizing the judiciary on matters of ethics and justice.
NI KUO-JUNG
Hsinchu
The coming propaganda war
China’s largest state-controlled news organizations, publishers and other media outlets such as Xinhua, CCTV, the People’s Daily and the Shanghai Media Group are planning to spend billions of dollars to expand overseas in what could be seen as an all-out propaganda blitzkrieg. And they have the money to accomplish their goal.
At a time when other global media are in retreat, a handful of state-controlled broadcasters and publishers has been thriving in China.
Part of the plan includes creating a 24-hour news channel along the lines of Al-Jazeera. Xinhua is planning to obtain a license to create a 24-hour news channel that would broadcast in English.
In addition to this planned 24-hour news-cum-propaganda channel, China’s media giants are also intent on acquiring foreign media assets, opening overseas news bureaus, and publishing and broadcasting in English and other languages worldwide.
Ostensibly, the Chinese government is doing this in an effort to create more respected international news organizations and to improve the country’s image abroad.
However, China’s “director of propaganda,” Liu Yun-shan (劉雲山), has provided what can be considered a more candid and chilling insight into his government’s motives. In an essay published this month, Liu wrote: “It has become an urgent strategic task for us to make our communication capability match our international status. In this modern era, who gains the advanced communications skills, the powerful communication capability and whose culture and values is more widely spread is able to more effectively influence the world.”
Although his grammar leaves a little to be desired, Liu’s meaning is obvious; and he — wittingly or not — reveals the true motivating factor behind China’s efforts. This planned propaganda poses an enormous threat to Taiwan, as big a threat as the 1,300 missiles now targeting it.
As Taiwan will likely be the principal target of this Chinese media aggression, Taiwan must therefore take this threat seriously. It must find a way to respond to, and counter, this threat effectively. Otherwise, Taiwan will find itself both marginalized politically in the international arena and overwhelmed in what can only be called the coming “propaganda war.”
Taiwan’s voice could be effectively drowned out. The only story that will be told will be China’s story.
Taiwan must somehow find a way of countering this threat, or else face disastrous consequences.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
There will be a new presidential administration in the United States in January 2025. It will be important for the Lai (賴清德) administration and America’s next administration to get on the same page quickly and visibly in respective efforts to bolster Taiwan’s security, economic vitality, and dignity and respect on the world stage. One key measure for doing so will be whether Washington and Taipei can coalesce around a common narrative for moving US-Taiwan relations forward. In recent years, Washington and Taipei have leaned into fear as a motivator for coordinated action. For a time, both sides publicly reinforced each other’s
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in
Embroiled in multiple scandals, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday announced that he would apply for a three-month leave of absence from his role as party leader, creating uncertainty about the future of the TPP and the “new politics” that he had promised to bring. Shortly after his announcement, Ko’s home and office were searched and he was questioned by prosecutors over his suspected involvement in a corruption case related to a real-estate development project. He was arrested early Saturday morning after he refused to be questioned at night and attempted to leave the prosecutors’ office. In