When Chris Lintott, a researcher in the department of physics at the University of Oxford, first considered launching a Web site to ask the public to help classify photographs of 1 million galaxies, he assumed it would probably take three or four years to complete.
Galaxy Zoo, (galaxyzoo.org) launched in July 2007, was supposed to be a side project; instead it has turned into the biggest citizen-science experiment on the Web.
Galaxies can be classified as spiral, elliptical or merging (when two come together). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey, or SDSS (www.sdss.org), has images of nearly 1 million galaxies; what those images don’t have in their raw form is the information about what class of galaxy is pictured.
Lintott had hoped that each image would get 10 classifications, or “clicks,” and that the public would prove able to classify galaxies accurately according to their features. Three weeks and 10 million clicks later, he was proved right: the public is capable of classifying galaxies as well as, or even better than, professional astronomers.
And quickly, too.
“It was like being hit by a tidal wave,” Lintott said.
The images have now had more than 70 million clicks in total, allowing Lintott and his team to go beyond simply sorting galaxies into spiral, elliptical or merging categories.
“You can have confidence, as we can say, ‘100 percent of people think that’s a spiral galaxy, so it’s really, really spirally,’” Lintott said.
His team was allocated precious time on the IRAM 30m radio telescope in southern Spain, and was easily able to select just 40 galaxies from the original sample to study, safe in the knowledge that the scientists had exactly what they needed.
After Galaxy Zoo’s initial success, Lintott wanted to take a closer look at merging galaxies. At 5pm one Tuesday, he posted a spreadsheet listing a selection to the forums and asked members to take a look and e-mail him the best. Then he went to the pub.
One “Zooite,” Richard Proctor, a telecoms consultant, spotted the spreadsheet and thought: “I can build a Web page to do that!”
By the time Lintott logged back in, the Web interface was already in use.
“What was going to be a quick little study turned into a much larger study of about 45,000 images,” Proctor said.
Each image has now had more than 25 clicks, with four particularly committed souls having seen every single one. The first academic paper about those merging galaxies has been submitted, and Proctor is listed as a co-author.
It’s not the first time collaborative astronomy has proved a hit online. The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) project created the most powerful distributed computer ever with its SETI@home project launched in May 1999, which used spare processing power on home computers to process data collected from a specific wavelength to see if aliens were trying to get in touch.
It was used by 5.2 million people and offered, at its peak, 265 teraflops (1 trillion calculations a second) of processing power.
Similarly, NASA’s Clickworkers project in 2000 to 2001, found that ordinary people were just as good as astronomers at identifying craters on Mars in photos.
The biggest influence on Galaxy Zoo, however, was Stardust@home, where users search for tiny interstellar dust particles within images returned by the 2006 Stardust mission. Thousands of users have logged on to the site.
“Stardust@home was a real inspiration for us,” Lintott said. “We thought, ‘If 20,000 people will look for dust grains in their spare time, surely they will look at beautiful pictures of galaxies?’”
But unlike those projects, where the task was set from the top down, the Galaxy Zoo community has its own ideas about what can be done with the SDSS data.
“Up until now,” Proctor said, “the professional astronomers have come up with things that want classifying and we’ve classified them.”
But there are thousands of irregular galaxies — neither spiral nor elliptical — that the professionals don’t have time to examine. So the community decided to do it themselves, drafting a list of questions and building a Web interface to make classification easier.
“Once we’ve got some results,” Proctor said, “we’ll publish them for everybody to use and then see if we can find out anything useful. Given that the biggest study of irregular galaxies to date looked at around 150, and we’ve got 9,000, we must find something!”
Lintott is supportive of the irregulars project: “They are doing everything professional astronomers would do. It’s up there with any work I’ve done.”
It’s not just the volume of research that can be done by collaborating with the public that’s important to Lintott, but also the opening up of scientific research to anyone with a browser and a little time.
“By making the data available to everyone,” he said, “whatever stage you are in your learning, you can do research.”
And a surprising number of people are doing just that. Hanny van Arkel is a Dutch primary school teacher who discovered a strange object, now called Hanny’s Voorwerp (Dutch for “object”), near a spiral galaxy.
“I thought it was fun,” she said of Galaxy Zoo. “But I didn’t expect that it would become such a big part of my life. I’ve learned a lot and it’s a good way of participating in science.”
Elisabeth Baeten, a Belgian secretary, is one of only four people who has seen every image in the galaxy merger project.
“I also classify the irregulars,” she said, “and in between I cruise the universe looking for asteroids and gravitational lenses.”
In future, it will be much easier for both scientists and enthusiasts to take part in such projects. Not only are Lintott and his colleagues finalizing Galaxy Zoo 2, which will examine galaxies in much more detail, they are also building a platform that will allow any scientist to upload data and tap into the vast potential of the Internet.
“Our users are clamoring for stuff to do,” Lintott said. “The problem of having too much data to pay close attention to is not just an astronomical problem. It’s astronomical in scale, but it’s not just us.”
The new project will allow scientists to upload their videos and pictures of galaxies or chemical structures, then specify what they want done with them. They can either use the provided templates, or customize their project. Lintott describes it as the scientific version of the popular blogging software WordPress.
And there are many uses of such a platform. NASA has high-quality images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, most of which are simply filed. And study of the pictures produced by this year’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will allow scientists to build a history of asteroid bombardment of the inner solar system.
“It’s like NASA does the map and we’ll write the guide book,” Lintott said.
Indeed, it would be possible for anyone to upload data, including amateur astronomers.
“More than a million separate observations a year are recorded by amateurs,” Lintott said. “That’s a huge pile of data that, at the minute, professionals slowly sort through, but we can hand that back to the amateurs to analyze. We may just be putting ourselves out of a job.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS