A YOUNG WOMAN died of H5N1 avian influenza virus in Beijing on Jan. 5. This should be a wake-up call for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration as it opens up the direct three links. With the opening of direct cross-strait passenger flights, it only takes four hours for the virus to reach Taiwan. In addition, the National Immigration Agency’s computer system at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport (and three others) crashed for 36 hours earlier this month, leaving national security wide open, thus causing a tremendous threat to public health in Taiwan.
Why is the world so scared of the bird flu virus? Because the 1918 human influenza epidemic — better known as the Spanish Flu — that killed between 20 million and 50 million people worldwide was also the result of a human-to-human spread of a different strain of bird flu. Bird flu is the source of human flu and the most direct example is chicken pox. Guangzhou is the main source of bird flu globally, with the world’s highest density of raised birds. Hong Kong and Taiwan are some of the closest located distribution channels.
The opening of the “small three links” posed a great risk and the opening of the direct three links on Dec. 15 made the risk even greater.
The main immediate cause of the human H5N1 outbreak in 2005 was the transmission of the virus through seasonal migration of wild geese from Qinghai Lake in Qinghai Province, spreading the virus from China and Southeast Asia to Turkey and Central Asia and further to Hungary in eastern Europe. Today, the threat has spread further to Western Europe, the UK and Canada.
The main distant cause, however, was the human H5N1 infection in Guangzhou in 1997 that resulted in the slaughtering of tens of millions of chickens in Hong Kong.
The case of a Hong Kong child infected with H5N1 while visiting relatives in Fujian Province in 1997 and the second wave of infections that swept Southeast and Central Asia in 2005 and 2006 showed that the virus can cause enteritis and encephalitis, but not pneumonia, a finding supported by The New England Journal of Medicine published on Feb. 17. It also showed that the virus tends to infect children and young adults in households raising birds and is accompanied by a death rate of more than 50 percent. The infection rate, however, is not high, and rather than droplet transmission typical in human flu, close contact is required for transmission.
Now that deaths from the virus have been reported in Beijing, Taiwanese businesspeople and tourists must take extra precautions. In the past, Hong Kong was a checkpoint for Taiwanese transferring to China, but with the opening of the direct links, the spread is no longer dependent on wild geese. In addition, it took more than one month for the Council of Agriculture to investigate the sudden death of chickens in Kaohsiung County. This is ridiculously inefficient and the public would probably be better served praying for protection.
The H5N1 virus can invade Taiwan in four hours and it is more powerful than missiles. The misery created by the SARS outbreak in 2003 should be sufficient to focus the mind. If the authorities are not alert to this situation, or if the media continue to ignore the situation intentionally or unintentionally, it is not impossible that deaths will occur in Taiwan. Should this happen, the country’s already ailing economy would suffer yet another blow. The Ma administration’s lopsided promotion of the benefits of the three direct links makes one wonder if the government is prepared for that possibility.
Mayo Kuo is a Taiwan-based pediatrician. His older brother Max Kuo is a US-based pediatrician.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of