True to form, the circus that is the Legislative Yuan ended the legislative session on Tuesday by burning the midnight oil to clear the heap of proposals and amendments in a show of efficiency, with lawmakers munching on late-night snacks on the legislative floor as they rushed to pass bills before the legislature adjourned for the spring recess.
Having failed to review the central government’s budget for this fiscal year, however, the legislature resolved yesterday to hold a provisional session today.
The less than stellar performance of the legislature since it convened in September has had many a critic shaking their head. Perhaps even more deplorable were complaints by some lawmakers yesterday that the provisional session would interfere with their vacation, as some had already purchased plane tickets and made commitments for group tours.
Have those legislators forgotten who put them in the legislature in the first place and that their role is to serve their constituents?
Rather than fret about sudden changes to their vacation plans, any responsible legislator would feel ashamed at wasting taxpayers’ money for the additional session.
After all, it was their inefficiency and months of foot-dragging that made the extra session necessary in the first place.
Some lawmakers could disagree with accusations of inefficiency by pointing to the 50 motions that were passed by the legislature in the four-hour marathon on Tuesday.
Eleventh-hour efficiency, perhaps. But quality? No.
The public could not care less about the number of bills passed in any given legislative session — that’s for bean counters and this isn’t what Taiwanese expect.
What matters is the quality of the legislation passed, its impact on people’s lives as well as on the development of the country.
Lawmakers are hardly in a position to vaunt their accomplishments, or claim that they fulfilled their mandate to keep the Executive Yuan in check, when so many bills, long stuck in limbo, are passed all at once, without appropriate debate on the floor.
Not to mention that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-controlled legislature once again failed to pass many of the much-anticipated “sunshine bills” that aim to eliminate government corruption and ensure clean politics — this despite a pledge by the government and the KMT caucus to make the passage of those bills a priority.
Perhaps more would be accomplished if legislators didn’t spend so much time talking drivel and bickering like children.
Perhaps the public would regain its trust in them if legislators rolled up their sleeves and for once acted as a responsible voice of the people.
As long as we allow the deplorable tradition of eleventh-hour blitzes in the legislature, however, we should not expect much more from them.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS