True to form, the circus that is the Legislative Yuan ended the legislative session on Tuesday by burning the midnight oil to clear the heap of proposals and amendments in a show of efficiency, with lawmakers munching on late-night snacks on the legislative floor as they rushed to pass bills before the legislature adjourned for the spring recess.
Having failed to review the central government’s budget for this fiscal year, however, the legislature resolved yesterday to hold a provisional session today.
The less than stellar performance of the legislature since it convened in September has had many a critic shaking their head. Perhaps even more deplorable were complaints by some lawmakers yesterday that the provisional session would interfere with their vacation, as some had already purchased plane tickets and made commitments for group tours.
Have those legislators forgotten who put them in the legislature in the first place and that their role is to serve their constituents?
Rather than fret about sudden changes to their vacation plans, any responsible legislator would feel ashamed at wasting taxpayers’ money for the additional session.
After all, it was their inefficiency and months of foot-dragging that made the extra session necessary in the first place.
Some lawmakers could disagree with accusations of inefficiency by pointing to the 50 motions that were passed by the legislature in the four-hour marathon on Tuesday.
Eleventh-hour efficiency, perhaps. But quality? No.
The public could not care less about the number of bills passed in any given legislative session — that’s for bean counters and this isn’t what Taiwanese expect.
What matters is the quality of the legislation passed, its impact on people’s lives as well as on the development of the country.
Lawmakers are hardly in a position to vaunt their accomplishments, or claim that they fulfilled their mandate to keep the Executive Yuan in check, when so many bills, long stuck in limbo, are passed all at once, without appropriate debate on the floor.
Not to mention that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-controlled legislature once again failed to pass many of the much-anticipated “sunshine bills” that aim to eliminate government corruption and ensure clean politics — this despite a pledge by the government and the KMT caucus to make the passage of those bills a priority.
Perhaps more would be accomplished if legislators didn’t spend so much time talking drivel and bickering like children.
Perhaps the public would regain its trust in them if legislators rolled up their sleeves and for once acted as a responsible voice of the people.
As long as we allow the deplorable tradition of eleventh-hour blitzes in the legislature, however, we should not expect much more from them.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s