When global experts in a given field come to Taiwan to see what is actually taking place under the watch of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) overseers, a pall quickly settles over the cliche of Taiwanese vibrancy and openness. The devil in the detail offers instant sobriety for anyone willing to look.
Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng’s (王清峰) renewed defense of her unhappy terrain is merely one instance of this government’s standard refusal to acknowledge international expertise and the legitimate concern of professionals who care for Taiwan’s future. The standard — and acutely patronizing — technique, at which Wang excels, is to say critics suffer from “misunderstandings,” smarmy code for “You are not Chinese and therefore intrinsically ignorant.”
Sadly, decay in governance does not rate highly on the agenda of other governments because its significance cannot compete with the greater interest of defusing the Taiwan Strait as a flashpoint — and as a thorn in the side of better relations between China and the world’s most powerful states.
Taiwan’s cause is not helped by being in a region dominated by governments that have struggled to be more than just structures that keep a population from rioting.
To the Washington policymaker or think tank researcher, fretting over Taiwanese domestic concerns would therefore reflect a grossly disorganized set of priorities when there are insurgencies, epidemics, juntas and terrorists to monitor.
Meanwhile, China’s growing influence in the region is benefiting from a dual malaise in the US government: the shadow of the Middle East obscuring the China threat (for those who acknowledge the threat), and the underlying US establishment belief in the sacredness of a Chinese state and its destiny (for those who do not).
So is that all there is to it? Can Taiwan’s plight — the increasing likelihood of annexation by an oppressive state with the KMT as its shepherd — only be taken seriously when it is far too late to intervene, assuming that the only nation that can do so still has the willpower?
There must be something about the decay of democratic sensibilities that would offend even the most credulous of China-friendly pundits in Washington. Part of this offense would derive from damage to the contribution that forces in the US have made to Taiwan’s economic success and political progress.
Such damage would also have philosophical consequences for a superpower that failed to live up to its promise of support and friendship for reasons that have been — from beginning to end — logical but dishonorable.
The final, crushing message would be: If natural resources are worth protecting, we are happy to generate undefeatable enemies, and if the price is right, by God, we are prepared to abandon our vulnerable friends.
The good, if bittersweet, news for Taiwan is that the fight will go on, in some form, over some period of time.
China might think it has friends in power now — in Taipei and possibly in Washington — but this temporary fillip cannot rewrite hundreds of years of colonial atrocity, nor prevent misrule by Chinese predators who are fundamentally hostile to Taiwan, its people and its way of life.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS