IOC blaming Tibetans?
In his year-end reflections on the Beijing Olympics, International Olympics Committee (IOC) president Jacques Rogge blamed Tibetans for the difficulties faced by the IOC in dealing with the Chinese government (“IOC was surprised by Tibet unrest, Rogge says,” Jan. 1, page 20). At a time when the violent conflict in the Middle East continues to escalate and the need for peaceful reconciliation is ever more urgent, it is irresponsible and inaccurate to accuse the Tibetans of turning to violence and “bloody unrest.”
The overwhelming majority of more than 130 protests against Chinese rule that swept across Tibet last year were peaceful, largely because of the example led by the Tibetans’ exiled leader — Nobel Peace Laureate the Dalai Lama — and the influence of Tibetan Buddhist culture. But the crackdown against them by the Chinese government was brutal.
Rogge’s comments are in line with Beijing’s propaganda, which seeks to represent the six-month cycle of largely peaceful dissent in Tibet as one violent riot in March.
The reality is that last year, Tibetans risked their lives to convey the message to the outside world that the Dalai Lama represents their interests, not the Chinese state, and to express their resentment against repressive policies undermining their religion and culture. In response, the Chinese government resorted to repressive and heavy-handed tactics that owe more to the political extremism and paranoia of the Maoist era than to a 21st century would-be superpower.
KATE SAUNDERS
Washington, DC
Chiu Yi’s ‘boring’ comment
I have to admit to being utterly speechless and dumbfounded to read the words spoken by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅). In what I can only assume to be an effort to console KMT Legislator Diane Lee (李慶安), Chiu said the job of legislator was “boring anyway,” and that she could take heart in the knowledge that she could do better in other fields (“Diane Lee quits KMT over dual citizenship scandal,” Dec. 31, 2008, page 1).
What sheer idiocy to make such a public statement. How heartless and base to utter such words! At best, this person is hopelessly out of touch with the every day world.
As if governing some 23 million people could be considered “boring” — especially during an economic crisis when many people have lost their jobs and some are having difficulties even putting food on the table.
There are many, many people who would gladly work very hard for one-eighth the wages earned by a legislator. Perhaps Chiu might give some thought and consideration to their plight.
It is a total disgrace, and even a little perverse, for Chiu — with his extremely high-paying sinecure post — to pronounce such risable inanities. Does Chiu seriously expect any pity for himself or for Lee? Can anyone in their right mind view such a notion tenable in the least bit? I have absolutely no pity for either Lee or Chiu.
With their sinecure positions and numerous privileges, Taiwanese legislators are among the highest paid in the world. And yet, all too often, certain members among their ranks brawl like drunken sailors on shore leave and in brothels, or like chimpazees in a zoo. Here in the US, Taiwanese legislative sessions serve as nightly entertainment on television, with snide commentary provided.
Perhaps if Chiu were to use a infinitesimally small portion of his brain, he could come up with some ideas to make his sinecure post less “boring.” For example, I can think of many things along the lines of social welfare and civil liberties. How about struggling for the dignity of Taiwan? In other words, perhaps he should make an attempt to do the job he was elected for.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS