As some stock markets around the world opened the new year with substantial increases in share prices on Friday, people may have hoped they could comfortably bid farewell to a dismal year while welcoming a more promising one.
Better think twice. There’s little reason to be optimistic about the global economy after several countries on Friday continued releasing weaker-than-expected economic data in the face of the ongoing global slump.
It started with Singapore, where the government said its economy might contract as much as 2 percent this year — worse than its November forecast of a 1 percent contraction or less — as the global downturn cut into demand for its goods.
A few hours later, South Korea said its exports fell 17.4 percent last month from a year earlier, which forced the export-dependent economy to post an annual trade deficit of US$13 billion last year — its first since 1997. Seoul now forecasts the nation’s exports might grow a mere 1 percent this year from last year.
The bad news didn’t stop there, however, as a slew of surveys around the world showed on Friday that last month China’s manufacturing output declined for a fifth month, Australian manufacturers faced shrinking output for a seventh month, US factory activity fell to a 28-year low and Eurozone manufacturers ended their collective output at an all-time low.
In Taiwan, the government’s most updated data showed domestic manufacturers posted a sharp decline in industrial production in November, the largest drop since late 2001.
These dismal manufacturing figures from countries around the world suggest that major economies are all suffering along with the US because of a lack of new orders. The data also meant that as the global manufacturing sector ended last year with deep concerns of a recession, this year is set to be a very difficult one.
In anticipation of this unprecedented challenge to their economies, several governments launched economic stimulus packages late last year, some including massive public projects, in a bid to boost domestic demand and fill the void left by slowing exports.
Policymakers have also acted with back-to-back interest rate cuts to create a loose monetary environment for households and companies, hoping this would lead to higher consumer spending and business investment. Some even took the unusual step of nationalizing key industries to avoid systemic risks.
Their efforts have however so far failed to generate economic results to contain the crisis. The reason their efforts haven’t worked wasn’t because the measures they took were wrong, but because the global slump this time is many times worse than people can imagine.
Some countries are already in recession while others are in danger of heading into one. But unlike previous recessions that tended to be brief and mild, the recession this time is likely to be longer in duration and far more severe in scope. Economists at Moody’s said the recession was formidable because of “the unparalleled magnitude and systemic cast of the financial crisis.”
Since the outlook remains grim in light of slowing orders, this year will surely be a bleak one marked by rising unemployment in particular. Therefore, there’s no reason to be optimistic.
If caution is the only antidote to the economic uncertainty, governments should avoid rash decisions and remain vigilant against civic unrest and trade protectionism that usually appear with rising unemployment. Should cross-border collaboration be necessary to prevent the world economy sliding into a protracted recession, governments should show people a much stronger and coordinated policy.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS