The forest of white windmills that make up Asia’s largest wind farm can be seen from miles away. Dotted across 2,000km2 of hills and villages on a basalt plateau in western India sit more than 800 turbines — generating more than 1,000 megawatts of electricity.
The towering machines, which stand 80m tall, cast shadows across fields tilled by man and buffalo — a stark juxtaposition of ancient and modern India. For one man, however, the windmill farm in Dhule is a fitting riposte to the critics who derided his dream to build a global green energy business from a country plagued by crippling power cuts.
In little more than a decade, Tulsi Tanti has made Suzlon Energy into the world’s fifth-largest producer of wind turbines — selling its turbines at a couple of million dollars apiece. Company turnover last year increased 29 percent to US$1.8 billion. About 90 percent of Suzlon’s order book is from markets outside India, largely the US, South America and China.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Despite the success, last year was an annus horribilis for the company. While Suzlon should have been reaping the benefits of a world hungry for clean energy, it has been hit by a triple whammy: The credit crunch sent its stock plummeting; cracks appeared in its rotor blades used by US customers, raising doubts over its technology; and the US$1.6 billion acquisition of Germany’s Repower, a turbine maker that produces giant offshore rigs, stalled.
The turbulence has hit the company hard. Suzlon’s stock price has crashed 90 percent since January last year to end up trading at just 56 rupees (US$1.20) last month — valuing the Tanti family’s 66 percent stake at US$1.6 billion.
Tanti brushes aside these episodes, seeing opportunities where others see crisis. In an interview from his Mumbai office, the 51-year-old concedes his paper fortune has been blown away by the economic storm but says the forecast for the company remains good.
Wind power producers can’t keep pace with demand at a time when concern about global warming is driving governments to promote greener electricity, he said.
“Our final product is electricity and that is sold at a fixed price. Demand is growing at 5 percent a year globally and you need [wind power] to prevent climate change and for energy security. It’s the only industry that is going to grow,” he said.
Tanti’s rationale is about demand and supply. He says that by 2020, the US, Europe, China and India will want to have 20 percent of their power supply from renewables. The issue is about making wind power “cost competitive” with carbon sources, especially coal, which fuels 65 percent of India’s electricity and costs at least a quarter less.
“Today wind power is just 1 percent of supply. It can grow to 7 percent by 2020. That is the maximum because industry has to find resources, material and execute projects. With greater volumes the price [of wind power] will drop ... and [governments] will ask what is the cost for pollution from carbon fuels. You will need a carbon tax,” he said.
More worrying perhaps were the questions raised about Suzlon’s key technologies. In June, Edison International, one of Suzlon’s biggest customers in the US, canceled an order for 150 turbines after cracks appeared in the rotor blades. Many began to fret — and were only reassured when the Indian company shipped out new turbines made of reinforced plastic.
Tanti says these incidents are “nothing new” for an emerging technology and that retrofitting 400 turbines in the US was the first “stiffness problem” encountered in more than a dozen years of business. The cost is only US$60 million, he says, pointing out that competitors have put aside similar amounts in previous years.
Suzlon’s biggest acquisition has been a rollercoaster ride. The Indian company won a bidding war with French nuclear power group Areva with a US$1.6 billion offer for Repower, a maker of huge wind turbines.
However, the deal remains in limbo after Suzlon’s initial financing deal fell apart as markets crumbled. Late last month, the company announced it would pay 270 million euros to increase its stake to 91 percent, the requirement under German law to control the company. Tanti expects to be in charge early this year.
Repower is key to Suzlon’s global strategy. Tanti said that by 2020, there would be only five to six global players, and to survive Suzlon needed to be big in the US, Europe and Asia. Tanti’s logic was that unlike in the US and Asia, where land is plentiful, in Europe he would need giant offshore wind turbines to produce electricity. Repower’s 5MW generator — double the power output of Suzlon’s biggest turbine — is 100m tall and has a rotor diameter of 126m, about two football pitches. It can only be serviced using a helicopter.
Coupled with this technology and a cost base which is 19 percent lower than the European company, Tanti says he can grow Repower’s business five-fold in a short span.
“It will take three of four years to develop this technology and we need access to European offshore markets. We can reduce the company’s cost and increase their margins and unlock value here,” he said.
Few people would bet against Tanti. In 1994 he ran a textile business and bought two wind turbines to power his factories after becoming frustrated with India’s high-cost, erratic electricity supply. Tanti, a trained mechanical engineer, became fascinated by the economics and technology involved.
In the 1990s, Western firms had little interest in India and Tanti spotted a gap in the market. He decided to leave textiles and began installing and servicing wind turbines for fast-growing companies in India. By the late 1990s he had built up a large domestic business, partly through convincing state governments to adopt a friendly tax regime for green power.
It is here that Suzlon’s ascent starts, a story of a canny developing world entrepreneur who saw that India’s cheap but highly trained work force could undercut rivals abroad. His next move was into manufacturing.
Tanti scoured the world for talent and innovations, buying up mainly European expertise. By 2000 he had set up a German research center and bought AE-Rotor Techniek, a bankrupt Dutch company, to design rotor blades. With foreign money flowing into India, he floated Suzlon in 2005, raising US$338 million and began expanding through acquisitions.
A year later Suzlon bought Belgium’s Hansen Transmissions, a maker of turbine gearboxes, for US$566 million. Hansen was a key acquisition — Suzlon got its hands on a component that was in short supply. Tanti sold 28 percent of Hansen’s stock on the London Stock Exchange, gaining a valuation of more than five times its purchase price.
There’s no doubting Tanti’s global reach. The family joined forces with Arcapita, a Bahrain-based investment bank, to buy China’s Honiton Energy in 2006.
He aims to build Asia’s largest wind farm, exceeding his Indian one in size, in Inner Mongolia that will generate 1,650MW of wind power.
The Chinese investment will total more than US$2 billion.
“China has the will to do this. The Chinese government has said it wants 100,000MW to come from wind. The country has a large potential of 250,000MW. That is why we have our manufacturing there. We are a Chinese local company too,” he said.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS