Over the past few days, China has continued an arbitrary crackdown on the signatories of Charter 08 — a move that flies in the face of its own laws.
Beijing has not recovered from the shock of the charter, a bold call for democratic reforms signed by hundreds of concerned citizens — including government officials — and it is not prepared to forgive.
Three weeks after the charter’s release, Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), former chairman of the non-governmental organization Independent Chinese PEN and a participant in the Tiananmen protests of 1989, spent his birthday in incommunicado detention.
Human Rights Watch said Liu’s arrest and detention violate “the minimum procedural guarantees specified under Chinese law.”
On Monday, Radio Free Asia reported on the situation unfolding in Sichuan, where signatories of Charter 08 have been subpoenaed and barred from communicating with the outside world. Those interrogated by police have said that questioning focused on how the Charter 08 movement was organized through the Internet.
Although it remains unclear what “crime” police are investigating, it is evident that they want to understand how dissidents scattered across the country managed to build a network.
China will have a hard time explaining in what way Liu and others, such as Zhang Zuhua (張祖樺), a legal expert who remains under police surveillance, violated the law or the principles enshrined in the Chinese Constitution, which protects freedom of speech. Beijing’s repression of Charter 08, which is now blocked on Google, Yahoo and Baidu in China, is itself a violation of that principle.
China tramples its own laws and inflicts arbitrary punishment on its perceived enemies in the name of “stability.” Yet, in the words of one of China’s best-known dissidents, human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng (高智晟), until China establishes rule of law, “the day when Chinese society is stable and harmonious will never come.”
Calls to end this latest crackdown have come from rights organizations such as the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and Amnesty International. Last week, a group of prominent figures — including academics and writers Salman Rushdie and Umberto Eco — sent an open letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) calling for Liu’s release.
Governments, including Taiwan’s, must back these calls.
The repression of Charter 08 should be of particular concern to the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Democratic reform and respect for human rights would not only benefit the 1.3 billion people of China, but also the 23 million Taiwanese living under the threat of missiles from across the Taiwan Strait.
Section 3, Article 18 of the charter, which addresses cross-strait relations, calls for negotiations between Taiwan and China “as equals” and urges Beijing to seek unification only through peaceful means and with full respect for democracy.
As ties with China grow stronger, the government must not shy away from criticizing Beijing and should strive to be a voice of freedom. In an interview soon after winning the presidential election, Ma said he believed Taiwan had a role to play in showing China the path to democracy. Yet it seems unlikely that Taiwan will play any such role unless it takes a firm stand against Beijing’s abuses of its own people.
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS