The problems with the T16 support pillar of the Maokong Gondola will have a long-lasting negative effect on public confidence — regardless of whether the government has the pillar reinforced or moved to another location.
The Taipei City Government and the engineering and building organizations responsible for the cable car were unable to prevent the problems from arising, nor were they able to take decisive action after the issue came to light.
Their attempts at crisis management have been too passive, which is what caused the current situation.
If the Taipei City Government cannot come up with a convincing plan to strengthen the foundation of the pillar or erect a new pillar at another location, the public’s safety worries will not diminish.
Judging from the news reports that I have read, I believe that the engineers may have been overly confident and failed to conduct a geological investigation and sample drilling during the planning stage and during construction.
They also seem to have neglected the importance of a safety monitoring system during construction and after operations began.
They were therefore unable to produce reliable data after the problem with the T16 support pillar came to light.
When they discovered that the top soil under the T16 support pillar was shifting, the engineers were also unable to take emergency measures, such as installing drop panels for the foundations, using breakwater tribars to fill in the footings of the cable car and other measures to reinforce the foundation.
They also failed to carry out any follow-up safety evaluations, instead just allowing the situation to deteriorate.
This is difficult to understand and is very upsetting.
Nine times out of 10, the collapse of a slope will cause flooding. The majority of safety risks posed by collapsed slopes are also related to problems of surface water, groundwater and other geological problems.
The Taipei City Government has commissioned the four major engineering associations in Taiwan — the Taipei Professional Civil Engineers Association, the Taipei Structural Engineers Association, the Taipei Professional Geotechnical Engineers Association and the Taipei Soil and Water Conservation Professional Engineers Association — to jointly assess the stability and problems of the T16 support pillar.
That is a laudable decision based on respect for the specialized skills and knowledge of the members of these associations.
The only problem with this, however, is that hydraulic engineers and engineers who specialize in applied geology have not been invited to help with the assessments. Perhaps city government officials do not think that hydrology and geology are a major part of the problem.
Hydraulic engineers were also excluded from the safety evaluations on the collapsed section of the Orange Line of the Kaohsiung MRT last year and this year when then DPP was still in power.
Back then, I wrote to the China Times, urging the authorities to respect the specialized skills of hydraulic engineers and to include them in the process.
Now the KMT is in power. The expertise of hydraulic engineers is still not valued, which is very disturbing.
If the T16 support pillar of the Maokong Gondola had had a safety monitoring system for side slopes and structures from the start, then the data from that system could now be consulted for evaluations and we would not be in a situation in which various people are saying different things about the cable car’s problems.
This matter alone makes it difficult for those involved in the cable car’s construction to clear themselves of blame.
Automatic monitoring systems are more reliable than expert professionals.
All of the side slopes of the cable car’s tower foundations and other structures need automatic monitoring and video camera systems installed. Where such systems are in place, they should be strengthened.
In addition, the Beitou Gondola should be built with this in mind.
These systems should then be linked with the safety monitoring systems used during the operation of the Gondola and should be monitored daily.
The control room of the cable car could adopt a more open method of operation and the authorities could even consider building the control room near a coffee shop or lookout area, in addition to periodically releasing the results of safety tests. These measures could ease public concerns.
If the Maokong Gondola is to continue operating, standard operational procedures for crisis management must be improved. The same goes for the system for making public statements.
With politicians and the media asking so many questions about the cable car, the information released to the public and the way this information is provided must be convincing. Expert engineers should be responsible for this information, otherwise the situation will only get worse.
The evaluation reports under way from the four engineering associations should become public property and the Taipei City Government should consider putting the information on the Internet, where it can be easily accessed.
This information should be open to public scrutiny. This is the only way that the truth of the matter will become clear. When necessary, public hearings could also be held to collect ideas and opinions from a wider segment of society.
Day Ching Her is a civil and hydraulic engineer and is the founder and former chairman of the Taiwan Association of Hydraulic Engineers.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS