“Building a democratic system is just the first step in protecting human rights. If a democratically elected government does not accept monitoring or respect the law, it may still act lawlessly and abuse its power, leading to discrimination and confrontation. To build a normal democratic society, therefore, we have to actively improve Taiwan’s politics, economy and human rights environment. Otherwise, democracy will exist in name only. Neither illegal acts and abuses of power by the government nor social inequality and injustice can be erased by the fine-sounding word ‘democracy’ alone.”
This comes from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Vice President Vincent Siew’s (蕭萬長) human rights White Paper entitled “Taiwan Human Rights Declaration for the New Century” (新世紀台灣人權宣言).
Few would dispute these words. The problem is, why does the declaration seem so ironic today? “Operation Concord,” carried out on Ma’s orders to guarantee the security of Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) during his visit last month, has become a byword for collective government abuse of power. The government has yet to review and reflect on events during Chen’s visit.
Faced with accusations that separation of powers under the Constitution is being upset by excessive centralization of power, the government has responded with cold arrogance, paying no attention to the problem.
Ma promised to amend the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), changing the permit system to a notification system to give the streets back to the public. In practice, however, he has used the police to deny the public its constitutional right to parade and assemble.
In response to calls from the Wild Strawberry Student Movement and other civic groups for amendments to this law, the Cabinet proposed an amendment that would change the law’s form but not its content; the proposed notification system would be compulsory, not voluntary.
Ma also said that party, political and military forces would cease exercising influence within the media, but now his administration is wantonly interfering in the Central News Agency and Radio Taiwan International. Ma even stood by as some of his Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) legislators pushed through an absurd resolution forcing the Public Television Service to secure item-by-item budgetary approval from higher authorities.
Ma said that prosecutors and investigators should strengthen their understanding of human rights protection. But in answering criticism from his former professor at Harvard University on the criminal detention system and human rights issues, Ma struck a different note, claiming that there were no such violations.
Ma has also said every citizen has the right to transparent information, but after the Ministry of Foreign Affairs received a report from the US government on the US nationality status of Taiwanese legislators, Ma allowed Minister of Foreign Affairs Francisco Ou (歐鴻鍊) to refuse to reveal the contents in an effort to cover up for at least one lawmaker who deceived the public.
This powerful leader is someone who says one thing before a presidential election but does another after it. Under today’s constitutional system and given the political reality, the public cannot reverse this situation straight away. And those who dare to protest are ridiculed as victims of their own deeds.
Ma must keep his promises and reflect on how he has departed from them. If he cannot, the discontent and anger simmering in civil society — now reflected in low approval ratings — will break out in a new wave of collective action.
Huang Kuo-chang is an assistant research fellow at the Preparatory Office of the Institutum Iurisprudentiae at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS