The Sydney Morning Herald yesterday reported that Indonesia and Australia are cooperating at the highest levels in preparation for “mega-disasters” with a view to developing policies of preventive action and response.
This is splendid news, and a welcome sign of cooperation in a region frequently beset by diplomatic tension and suspicion.
These inevitable catastrophes will affect not only the country or countries where they occur, but also entire regions and the interconnected economies they sustain.
One of the report’s authors warned that population growth and denser habitation of fragile areas — which would have been avoided or sparsely populated in previous centuries — mean that natural disasters could wreak terrible losses.
Among the most vulnerable locations were said to be “mega-cities in the Himalayan belt, China, Indonesia and the Philippines [which are] prime candidates for earthquakes that could cause more than a million deaths.”
This research suggests that the greater the magnitude of a natural disaster, the greater the damage that can be felt by neighboring countries as “interaction of climate change, urbanisation, poor land use planning and tension about access to resources” heightens humanitarian crises.
A disaster at a time of economic crisis would result in even worse consequences, heightening social unrest in affected areas as victims struggle to recover and neighbors hesitate to donate from shrinking bank accounts.
Taiwan is one of the world’s most seismically active countries, but more rigorous building codes mean that the most severe of earthquakes and typhoons take far fewer lives than events of similar magnitude in countries like Pakistan, China, Myanmar and Bangladesh.
Though this sense of security has the tendency to promote parochialism, Taiwanese should not ignore the warning signs of growing social, economic and environmental tensions in neighboring states — and need to be better informed at civic and government policy levels to establish and monitor risk. The Philippines is a case in point, though China is slowly moving in a direction that suggests economic growth will not be able to stave off widespread social upheaval and conflict.
In China’s case, this week’s news that a rigged court denied compensation and accountability to parents of children who died in poorly built classrooms during the Sichuan earthquake suggests that the country has a long way to go before it can reach some level of sobriety on such long-term challenges.
The good news is that Taiwan has the potential to play a very positive role in helping China to take a step toward peaceful and constructive integration with its neighbors. At the moment, this is being simplistically interpreted as a chance for some to get rich as the Chinese market expands and for Taiwan to deny its constructive characteristics in the process.
The longer view, however, suggests that wealth is a regional, if not global, issue, and that if China persists in being a social, political and environmental weak link, then it will end up dragging everyone down with it.
In the end, with natural disasters, as with economic fidelity, we are all in it together.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS