Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference member Hu Angang (胡鞍鋼) once said there is no need for China to take up arms against Taiwan, and that doing so would be the worst option. Hu said Taiwan’s economic dependence on China runs so deep that economic sanctions would bring Taiwan to its knees in seven days. In Hu’s words, Taiwan is like a diabetes patient in need of China’s insulin.
This 2006 statement is indirect evidence that China may launch economic sanctions against Taiwan at any time. At the time, cross-strait trade had reached a total of US$100 billion, and Taiwan’s trade surplus with China had reached US$66.13 billion. Today, these figures have repeatedly been exceeded. With the opening up of direct transportation links, dependence has reached a new level.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that direct transportation links spell the end of the “no haste, be patient” and “effective management” policies. It seems Taiwan really has become reliant on Chinese insulin.
Saying direct links are turning Taiwan into a diabetic may turn out to be more than mere satire because of government incompetence. Speeches by Ma and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) at the three links inaugural ceremony clearly show that the government is basing deregulation on the ideological viewpoint that anything that involves opening up to China is a good thing.
The lack of complementary measures to open Taiwan to the international community means that the practical effects can be easily determined. Due to factor-price equalization, Taiwan’s increasingly closer connection to low-wage, low-cost China is resulting in falling, rather than increased, incomes. Forging closer ties with an economy whose exports are suffering heavily from the global economic slowdown will lead to Taiwan being sucked dry rather than benefiting from these ties.
The government likes to talk about the “one day community” concept, as it will only take 80 minutes to fly from Taipei to Shanghai, less time than it takes the high speed rail to run from Taipei to Kaohsiung.
As tourist spots in China are cutting prices to gain competitiveness, and given the lower cost of living in China together with accompanying government policies, one wonders whether the Ma administration has made any preparations to help the domestic tourism industry strengthen its competitiveness or whether it will let companies fend for themselves and let the Chinese-controlled market decide the outcome.
Government data shows that cross-straight charter flights have increased Taiwanese tourism to China, while Chinese tourism to Taiwan remains unchanged. If this continues, domestic hotels, bus companies and tourist shops will suffer, aggravating domestic unemployment. It would be no exaggeration to say that the deregulation seems aimed at boosting the Chinese, not the Taiwanese, economy.
Liu’s statement that the benefits to Taiwanese agricultural product and fresh foods industries from direct cross-strait links will arrive “faster than if they were delivered by express delivery” distorts the facts and could be construed as deceiving farm and fishery workers.
The first sea transport carried textile and paper raw materials, and it will bring back malt, vegetables and corn starch. This is not a one-way street for selling Taiwanese oranges and grouper fish to China, and future price dumping of Chinese agricultural produce is all but certain. Taiwan’s agricultural sector will bear the brunt of these developments and within six months, Taiwanese farmers will feel the pinch.
The key to selling Taiwanese products in China is not speed but price. What preparations has the government made to help protect Taiwanese farmers?
On Monday Ma said the economic effect of direct cross-strait transportation links would be worth NT$3 billion (US$92.4 million). Where does this figure come from? No one believes his promises any more, and there were even rumors that the goods containers in the first shipments were only half full, although official reports said they were fully loaded.
The cross-strait agreements stipulate that the daily charter flights can only carry mail, not other goods, and there aren’t even any fifth freedom rights — the right of an airline of one country to land in a different country, pick up passengers, and carry them on to a third country.
The limited benefits can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and while they will not trickle down to the general public, the public will have to share the burden of any losses. Is the government really trying to benefit a few rich corporations at the cost of the poor?
Is the goal of the direct three links to create economic benefits for Taiwan or to bleed Taiwan dry? The government’s motives are questionable. It seems the patient’s situation is deteriorating and that it in the end will require the Chinese insulin. Ma must respond to the claim that Taiwan will fall in a mere seven days of economic warfare, without China even lifting a gun.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS