On Dec. 12, the Judicial Reform Foundation, the Humanistic Education Foundation and other organizations gathered at Liberty Square in front of the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall in support of Huang Yi-ling (黃怡翎), Tseng Hung-wen (曾虹文) and Lin Yun-tzu (林芸姿), all victims of police brutality during the visit of Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林). The organizations also criticized the police for abusing their power.
Shortly after, the trio went to the Taipei District Court for their lawsuit against former Songshan Precinct police chief Huang Chia-lu (黃嘉祿). I also attended, supporting them out of my own free will, but also to familiarize myself with the surroundings. With the government joining hands with China to suppress Taiwanese, I might have to attend court against my will one day.
Maybe this will happen sooner than I expected. For on Monday, the neighborhood police came looking for me. There was no one at home, but when my wife made enquiries later on, she was told that they wanted me to fill in forms relating to “mainland individuals.”
My wife replied that since I am from Hong Kong, the law regards me as an “overseas Chinese from Hong Kong,” not a “mainland individual.”
I lived in Hong Kong for 21 years, and twice during this time — first in 1992 and then again in 1995 — the Chinese government confiscated my Home Return Certificate for Compatriots from Hong Kong and Macau; it didn’t see me as a compatriot. When I left Hong Kong for the US in 1997, I traveled on a “British National (Overseas)” passport, and when I applied to enter Taiwan, it was with this passport.
In the winter of 2005, the pan-green camp suffered a difficult defeat in the three-in-one elections, and I worried that Taiwan would become a sacrificial object in the government’s policy of joining hands with China. In the spring of the following year, I settled in Taiwan.
Since my wife is Taiwanese and I am from Hong Kong, I was granted Republic of China (ROC) citizenship after one year and obtained an ROC passport. Both the National Immigration Agency and the local police are well aware of all this information. I moved into a new home almost a year ago and I registered my new address as soon as I moved.
Now the police suddenly want to treat me as a “mainland individual” and require my “data.” They are surely intending this as a warning and probably want to register me as a “mainland individual” to be able to control me. Aren’t they aware that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) himself is from Hong Kong?
In an interview with FTV, Ma said that police abuse was being investigated, but what is there to investigate, given that those who were to be promoted have been promoted? Now they are investigating me instead of the police.
I came to Taiwan for a very simple reason: I care for this land and its democratic system. That is also why I don’t want Taiwan to fall into the hands of Chinese thugs. Since Taiwan is my home, I enthusiastically participate in activities to safeguard it, including around the time of Chen’s visit.
I called on Taiwanese not to fight each other — including the police and the public — because the police were being forced to carry out Ma’s orders. In doing so, I offended the forces that work to divide and betray Taiwan.
Since they are preparing to take action against me, I will make my intentions clear: I will continue to participate in activities that safeguard Taiwan. If the government takes any action against me or if I am framed, or if I have an accident, the guilty party will be Ma and his backers in the Chinese Communist Party.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS