Reporters Without Borders, an NGO devoted to press freedom, issued a statement on Wednesday saying that despite recent assurances to the contrary from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), it was concerned that media independence in Taiwan remains under threat from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government.
The statement highlighted KMT attempts to control the programming of Public Television Service (PTS). The party’s legislators have proposed that PTS would require item-by-item approval from the Government Information Office (GIO) for all budget matters.
The KMT’s “campaign to reaffirm its influence over the public TV stations seems to have strengthened,” the statement read, before urging the president “to set up mechanisms that guarantee media independence.”
Ma’s reply to an earlier statement by the group in October, in which he reiterated his inauguration speech promise that “Taiwan’s democracy should not be marred by … political interference in the media,” obviously didn’t satisfy them.
Maybe it too is aware, like most people in Taiwan, of how little influence the president actually wields over KMT legislators — or the party in general, for that matter.
In its October letter, Reporters Without Borders secretary-general Jean-Francois Julliard expressed concern about two incidents that took place earlier that month. The first was the resignation of several Radio Taiwan International senior managers, who claimed that the government had asked them not to broadcast reports critical of China. The second was the resignation of Central News Agency (CNA) deputy editor-in-chief Chuang Feng-chia (莊豐嘉), who said the agency’s reporters had been asked to drop stories deemed to be critical of Ma.
In an open letter before his resignation, Chuang lamented that if things proceeded on their present course, one day CNA reportage might come to be regarded with the same skepticism as that of Xinhua news agency, the Chinese government mouthpiece.
Chuang would have had no idea how quickly his prophecy would come to pass. One glance at the headlines from Monday’s CNA English-language service reveals an ominous Xinhua-like appearance.
“Keelung expects renewed prosperity from direct shipping with China,” “History made as new cross-strait flight route inaugurated,” “Southern counties eyeing tourism opportunities from direct links,” “Maritime pilots welcome opening of cross-strait shipping links,” are just a few of the overwhelmingly positive headlines on offer, despite the fact that Taiwan is approaching an official period of recession.
How quickly things have changed since January last year, when Reporters Without Borders founder and then secretary-general Robert Menard received the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy’s Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award for 2006.
At the time, Menard told then-GIO chief Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) that his organization needed the Taiwanese government’s help to pressure China into releasing people jailed simply for what they had written. Given the government’s recent actions there seems to be little hope of this request being granted.
When receiving his award, Menard also said that Reporters Without Borders would use the US$100,000 prize money to launch a new Chinese-language Web site to allow people in Chinese-speaking nations to be better informed.
Thank goodness for this, because the way things are going, Taiwanese themselves may soon require other sources in the Chinese language if they want to learn of the health of the media in their country.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS