Some of life’s most embarrassing experiences can turn out to be reminders of the importance of polite behavior, especially in the political sphere.
This week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅) offered a vivid example of how we should treat others the way we would want others to treat us.
Chiu — famed for his practice of uncovering “dirt” on fellow legislators and his attack-dog manner in his nightly talkshow appearances — was confronted on Monday by a supporter of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) who ripped off his toupe in front of TV cameramen in front of the Control Yuan.
Chiu had been completing an application for the impeachment of the judge that released Chen from detention following his indictment.
The stunt became a top-of-the-hour report on every news station, regardless of political orientation, while enthusiastic discussion followed in various online forums — not to mention an impersonation of Chiu and his cranial foibles on a satirical TV program.
Seemingly holding back tears, Chiu on Monday night said that what concerned him the most was the feelings of his children: “They asked me: ‘Daddy, what shall I say tomorrow when I go to school and people ask me [about your toupe]?’” Chiu said.
Chiu expressed concern that his children may have to deal with taunts from their peers as a result of the incident.
Such tormenting of children is regrettable, if inevitable. It is a shame, therefore, that Chiu seems not to have considered the effect of his frequently baseless accusations on the children of his victims over the years.
For example, when Chiu went after Chen Hsing-yu (陳幸妤), the former president’s daughter, for allegedly holding a fortune in illegitimate funds in US banks, it is unlikely that the effect of his accusations on Chen Hsing-yu’s children were at the top of his list of ethical considerations.
In itself, whether or not Chiu wears a toupe is a worthless and trivial issue, except to the extent that it signifies a man who wants the viewing public to see him in a more flattering light. But the only real substance behind this lies in the fact that Chiu has insisted time and again to reporters that he does not wear a toupe.
Chiu must take responsibility for his actions and for the anger and resentment that his hubris and slander generate. Celebrity status and the special political protection he has received from KMT headquarters — evidenced by his astonishingly high ranking on the legislative-at-large ticket, which guaranteed his election — have given this man a sense of indestructibility.
But as he himself admits, there are sacrifices to be made in public life, including the untold damage that can be wrought on family, and children in particular.
Chiu’s children could just as likely be asked this question by their playground foes: “Why is your father a convicted criminal and a liar?”
If Chiu’s concern for innocents is genuine, we might expect from him a more contrite and considered approach to political dialogue, and the ceasing of defamatory attacks on colleagues and other people without solid evidence at hand.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS