The freedom to talk
“Opportunistic, rash and shortsighted” — this is what the Beijing government has branded the meeting between the Dalai Lama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy. But the words more aptly describe Beijing’s tactics.
The recent demand by Beijing that Sarkozy not meet with the Dalai Lama was ridiculous and, thankfully, ignored. The very fact that the demand was made at all illustrates the naivete and pompous attitude of the Chinese government in its attempt to push the political agenda outside its own country.
Politics is often complicated but meeting freely and communicating is a basic human right that should be vigilantly guarded at all costs.
Governments such as those in North Korea and Myanmar suppress the right of people to assemble and communicate their views to one another, and are seen as backward regimes. It is surprising that China, for all its celebrated progress, would continue to use such tactics to thwart personal communication.
It is particularly alarming that China would even attempt to make demands on two people living outside its own borders.
Sarkozy could not have afforded to kowtow to these unreasonable demands; the implications were too terrible to imagine. It would call into question his integrity as a leader who places basic human freedoms before politics.
Let’s look at what China accomplished. It received a black eye in the international arena. After putting its best foot forward in this year’s Olympics, Beijing has tarnished its progressive image by playing the bully and storming out of an EU summit.
China’s claim that the Sarkozy meeting with the Dalai Lama hurt the feelings of the Chinese people is downright silly — and talk of boycotts on French products only serves to illustrate this point.
Sarkozy was right to assert that he was “free to talk to whoever he wants.” We all should be: It is a matter of values, convictions and, above all, freedom.
Paul Oliver
Zuoying, Kaohsiung City
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS