Ignoring Chinese complaints, French President Nicolas Sarkozy met the Dalai Lama in Poland last Saturday. Sarkozy was also the first sitting president of the EU to meet the spiritual leader.
The Chinese government responded to the meeting with predictable hysteria.
Prior to the meeting, China had tried to intimidate Sarkozy through various channels.
According to reports in pro-Beijing media outlets, the threats included Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) refusing to participate in a Dec. 1 summit with the EU; postponing negotiations on the purchase of French Airbus aircraft, which would affect tens of billions of US dollars in orders; and resuscitating boycotts of French goods.
ANGER
There are three reasons for China’s anger.
First, the two countries have established a comprehensive strategic partnership, but France is now refusing to assist China in the process of suppressing its enemies.
Second, 13 years ago China gave Sarkozy a high-level reception at a time when his political career wasn’t going too well.
Then, when Sarkozy visited China in November last year for the first time after becoming French president, he was given the same grand welcome as former US president Bill Clinton.
Third, China is experiencing economic problems and there is talk of a “February crisis.” Beijing is therefore trying to divert public attention by manufacturing external crises.
In addition, if other countries were to emulate Sarkozy, it would be China, and not the Dalai Lama, that would be isolated.
Sarkozy’s response was that he did not regret the meeting, and that as both French and EU president, he represented the value of — and belief in — freedom.
He also said that the world needs an open China to participate in global governance, and that China needs a strong Europe to maintain the rate of Chinese employment.
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner also said: “We cannot have France’s conduct dictated to, even by our friends.”
LACK
Compare this with Taiwan, where President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) rejected a visit by the Dalai Lama out of a clear lack of understanding of the value of freedom.
Ma arrived at his decision without incurring a warning from Beijing and in the process ignored Taiwanese sovereignty and human rights.
Sarkozy is more strongly opposed to communism than his predecessor, Jacques Chirac, just as German Chancellor Angela Merkel is more anti-communist than her predecessor, Gerhard Schroeder.
There may be many reasons for this state of affairs, but Sarkozy’s father emigrated from communist Hungary, while Merkel is from the former East Germany.
They are willing to meet the Dalai Lama because they have experienced communist rule, which has given them a deeper appreciation of freedom and human rights.
The Dalai Lama was invited to Poland to attend the 25th anniversary of former Solidarity leader and Polish president Lech Walesa’s Nobel Peace Prize. The Dalai Lama has also been awarded this prize.
Ma is hallucinating if he thinks he can win a Nobel Prize for working together with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) — who has wreaked oppression and bloodshed in Tibet — to sign a cross-strait peace agreement.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS