Ignoring Chinese complaints, French President Nicolas Sarkozy met the Dalai Lama in Poland last Saturday. Sarkozy was also the first sitting president of the EU to meet the spiritual leader.
The Chinese government responded to the meeting with predictable hysteria.
Prior to the meeting, China had tried to intimidate Sarkozy through various channels.
According to reports in pro-Beijing media outlets, the threats included Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) refusing to participate in a Dec. 1 summit with the EU; postponing negotiations on the purchase of French Airbus aircraft, which would affect tens of billions of US dollars in orders; and resuscitating boycotts of French goods.
ANGER
There are three reasons for China’s anger.
First, the two countries have established a comprehensive strategic partnership, but France is now refusing to assist China in the process of suppressing its enemies.
Second, 13 years ago China gave Sarkozy a high-level reception at a time when his political career wasn’t going too well.
Then, when Sarkozy visited China in November last year for the first time after becoming French president, he was given the same grand welcome as former US president Bill Clinton.
Third, China is experiencing economic problems and there is talk of a “February crisis.” Beijing is therefore trying to divert public attention by manufacturing external crises.
In addition, if other countries were to emulate Sarkozy, it would be China, and not the Dalai Lama, that would be isolated.
Sarkozy’s response was that he did not regret the meeting, and that as both French and EU president, he represented the value of — and belief in — freedom.
He also said that the world needs an open China to participate in global governance, and that China needs a strong Europe to maintain the rate of Chinese employment.
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner also said: “We cannot have France’s conduct dictated to, even by our friends.”
LACK
Compare this with Taiwan, where President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) rejected a visit by the Dalai Lama out of a clear lack of understanding of the value of freedom.
Ma arrived at his decision without incurring a warning from Beijing and in the process ignored Taiwanese sovereignty and human rights.
Sarkozy is more strongly opposed to communism than his predecessor, Jacques Chirac, just as German Chancellor Angela Merkel is more anti-communist than her predecessor, Gerhard Schroeder.
There may be many reasons for this state of affairs, but Sarkozy’s father emigrated from communist Hungary, while Merkel is from the former East Germany.
They are willing to meet the Dalai Lama because they have experienced communist rule, which has given them a deeper appreciation of freedom and human rights.
The Dalai Lama was invited to Poland to attend the 25th anniversary of former Solidarity leader and Polish president Lech Walesa’s Nobel Peace Prize. The Dalai Lama has also been awarded this prize.
Ma is hallucinating if he thinks he can win a Nobel Prize for working together with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) — who has wreaked oppression and bloodshed in Tibet — to sign a cross-strait peace agreement.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS