At the invitation of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) delivered a keynote speech yesterday marking International Human Rights Day in Taipei.
In his speech, Ma expressed the wish that the legislature would speedily approve the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights to show the importance Taiwan attaches to human rights.
Kudos to Ma for bringing up the issue, which would suggest that he agrees with Article 1 of both covenants, which states: “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
Talk is cheap, however, and so are lofty legislative performances if not backed up by concrete action. Even if the legislature does approve the two UN covenants, they could end up as two more pieces of paper gathering dust if not followed by amendments to various laws in the spirit of the covenants.
If not, the Referendum Law (公民投票法) will remain a “birdcage” law that deprives people from exercising direct democracy, and the Assembly and Parade Law (集會遊行法) will remain a terrible piece of legislation that denies the public the right to freely assemble and express their views.
While yesterday marked the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it was also a day of ironies for the Ma administration, even as Ma trumpeted his message on human rights to the audience.
In his speech, Ma said: “The government has worked incessantly to uphold human rights ... Taiwan has also become the freest country in the world for those wishing to assemble or parade.”
In his inauguration speech, Ma also pledged that: “Taiwan’s democracy should not be marred by illegal eavesdropping, arbitrary justice or political interference in the media or electoral institutions.”
Again, irony struck on International Human Rights Day when the Public Television Service (PTS, 公視) alleged that the government was mulling censorship measures.
The ad ran by PTS yesterday in various newspapers said that the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee and the Internal Administration Committee — both KMT controlled — had passed a resolution demanding that all future programs, productions and budgets receive approval from government agencies such as the Council of Indigenous Peoples, the Council for Hakka Affairs and the Overseas Compatriot Affairs Commission.
In view of these events, coupled with lingering discontent over police brutality against protesters during Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin’s (陳雲林) visit to Taipei last month, maybe the biggest irony of all was Ma being chosen to present this year’s Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award in the first place.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS