To help businesses affected by the financial crisis, Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) directed the Ministry of Finance on Friday to formulate a reward and punishment scheme to force the heads of state-run banks to ease their lending policy. This might be helpful to businesses but portends increased risks for banks.
As the government has no control over private banks’ lending practices, the ministry said it would ask the Bankers Association of the Republic of China to establish a similar mechanism for private banks.
On Thursday, Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Sean Chen (陳冲) said the commission was considering transferring the nation’s postal savings — totaling NT$4 trillion (US$119.2 billion) — to small and medium-sized private banks, hoping this move would help spur more lending to local businesses.
The government’s commitment to helping as many companies as possible given the severity of the ongoing financial turmoil is commendable. It is also encouraging to see the administration’s firm stance against banks tightening credit to local companies. The ministry went as far as to state bluntly on Friday that banks should grant more loans to businesses in need to show their good will given the government’s blanket deposit guarantees announced in October.
And with the unemployment rate surging to a five-year high of 4.37 percent last month, the government is evidently hoping that if banks could extend loans to businesses and help them weather the current turmoil, companies won’t have to resort to massive layoffs.
But none of these considerations is strong enough to ease concerns about potential lending risks and rising bad loans, especially if the government were to push through with its proposed reward and punishment scheme.
Banks earn profits mainly through lending. Empirical studies have shown a positive correlation between a bank’s profitability and the economic climate, meaning the current economic downturn is likely to undercut profitability.
Against this backdrop, what a responsible bank should and can do is adopt a conservative lending stance, maintain a cautious assessment of customers’ ability to repay their loans, adjust its organizational structure and implement cost-cutting measures.
Aside from taking their shareholders’ interests into account, banks should avoid the potentially negative consequences of irresponsible or politically motivated lending — an old but notorious habit that led to a sizable build-up of overdue loans at state banks under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government in the 1990s.
A report by the Chinese-language Economic Daily News last week estimated that local banks had extended NT$1.3 trillion in loans to chipmakers, flat-panel manufacturers, airlines, construction firms and the high speed railway, and banks may need to set aside about NT$100 billion in loan provisions next year to cover potential bad debts if the downturn continues.
Overdue loans are tolerable up to a certain level. What has raised people’s eyebrows is that the government’s reward/punishment scheme is likely to coerce more lending from banks — be they state-run or privately owned — while enhancing a potential moral hazard as the measure could allow corrupt government officials and legislators to press banks for privileged loans.
While it may sound reasonable to help businesses by loosening credit, it is not yet clear how the government can make it happen without compromising the nation’s financial stability. The government needs to be careful in implementing this measure when it comes out with a detailed plan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS