On Friday last week, Yunlin District Court annulled the election to the legislature of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus secretary-general Chang Sho-wen (張碩文) in the opening trial of a vote-buying case. It is a case that has taken twists and turns.
Chang’s father, Chang Hui-yuan (張輝元), chairman of the Yunlin Irrigation Association, had been detained on suspicion of bribing people to vote for his son, but is now out on bail of NT$10 million (US$300,000). Prosecutors are seeking a 30-year jail term.
The vote-buying in this case was wide-ranging and sophisticated. As many as 15 of the legislator’s vote captains were involved and most of them were found guilty.
On April 19, the day after the court released the elder Chang on bail, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) ran a story entitled “The legal deadline for nullifying Chang Sho-wen’s election result has passed.”
Many readers wrote in to criticize the prosecutors for letting Chang off the hook. In response, the prosecutors argued that it was the father who was accused of vote-buying, not Chang Sho-wen himself, thus nullifying the election was inconsistent with the law.
But now, the court has declared Chang’s election invalid. The verdict shows just how negligent Yunlin’s prosecutors were in handling the case.
Among the 295 legislative candidates who stood for 79 seats in local constituencies, 18 have been charged with criminal offenses related to vote-buying. Of these, six were elected and 12 were not. Prosecutors have launched proceedings against five of the six, calling for their elections to be annulled.
A proposal to amend the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) is on the agenda. The idea is to amend Article 127, which would annul an election after an unsuccessful second appeal instead of after an unsuccessful first appeal, as is the case now.
If the amendment were passed, it would allow elected officials suspected of vote-buying to serve out their terms as their cases drag on from one trial to another. The law as it stands is a thorn in the side of corrupt legislators, with its so-called “blitzkrieg clause” requiring that the verdict after the first appeal be final, and that the duration of each trial be limited to six months.
The effectiveness of the existing law can be seen from the fact that, among officials elected in 2005, 37 city and county councilors have been removed from their posts and replaced by runner-up candidates, while 14 city mayors, county commissioners and township mayors have been dismissed and replaced in by-elections.
If the law is not amended, the 18 legislators and defeated candidates who are facing criminal charges will see their cases move to an appeal. If their convictions are upheld, the unsuccessful candidates will go to prison immediately, while those elected will be removed from their seats and then go to jail.
If the Act is changed so that cases limited to two trials are allowed one more appeal, the example of former Taichung City Council speaker Kuo Yen-sheng (郭晏生), which has dragged on for 13 years after he was accused of irregularities in 1995, will be commonplace. If vote-buying cases against elected officials cannot be resolved within their term of office, there would be little point in investigating anyone.
The Yunlin example shows that prosecutors need more education on probing vote-buying cases. The Ministry of Justice should investigate the handling of the Chang case to see if there is more to it than meets the eye.
Wang Chou-ming is a master’s candidate specializing in corruption studies at the Department of Political Science at Tunghai University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND JULIAN CLEGG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS