On Friday last week, Yunlin District Court annulled the election to the legislature of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus secretary-general Chang Sho-wen (張碩文) in the opening trial of a vote-buying case. It is a case that has taken twists and turns.
Chang’s father, Chang Hui-yuan (張輝元), chairman of the Yunlin Irrigation Association, had been detained on suspicion of bribing people to vote for his son, but is now out on bail of NT$10 million (US$300,000). Prosecutors are seeking a 30-year jail term.
The vote-buying in this case was wide-ranging and sophisticated. As many as 15 of the legislator’s vote captains were involved and most of them were found guilty.
On April 19, the day after the court released the elder Chang on bail, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) ran a story entitled “The legal deadline for nullifying Chang Sho-wen’s election result has passed.”
Many readers wrote in to criticize the prosecutors for letting Chang off the hook. In response, the prosecutors argued that it was the father who was accused of vote-buying, not Chang Sho-wen himself, thus nullifying the election was inconsistent with the law.
But now, the court has declared Chang’s election invalid. The verdict shows just how negligent Yunlin’s prosecutors were in handling the case.
Among the 295 legislative candidates who stood for 79 seats in local constituencies, 18 have been charged with criminal offenses related to vote-buying. Of these, six were elected and 12 were not. Prosecutors have launched proceedings against five of the six, calling for their elections to be annulled.
A proposal to amend the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) is on the agenda. The idea is to amend Article 127, which would annul an election after an unsuccessful second appeal instead of after an unsuccessful first appeal, as is the case now.
If the amendment were passed, it would allow elected officials suspected of vote-buying to serve out their terms as their cases drag on from one trial to another. The law as it stands is a thorn in the side of corrupt legislators, with its so-called “blitzkrieg clause” requiring that the verdict after the first appeal be final, and that the duration of each trial be limited to six months.
The effectiveness of the existing law can be seen from the fact that, among officials elected in 2005, 37 city and county councilors have been removed from their posts and replaced by runner-up candidates, while 14 city mayors, county commissioners and township mayors have been dismissed and replaced in by-elections.
If the law is not amended, the 18 legislators and defeated candidates who are facing criminal charges will see their cases move to an appeal. If their convictions are upheld, the unsuccessful candidates will go to prison immediately, while those elected will be removed from their seats and then go to jail.
If the Act is changed so that cases limited to two trials are allowed one more appeal, the example of former Taichung City Council speaker Kuo Yen-sheng (郭晏生), which has dragged on for 13 years after he was accused of irregularities in 1995, will be commonplace. If vote-buying cases against elected officials cannot be resolved within their term of office, there would be little point in investigating anyone.
The Yunlin example shows that prosecutors need more education on probing vote-buying cases. The Ministry of Justice should investigate the handling of the Chang case to see if there is more to it than meets the eye.
Wang Chou-ming is a master’s candidate specializing in corruption studies at the Department of Political Science at Tunghai University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND JULIAN CLEGG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS