Grease the pig for slaughter
Dear Johnny,
It has been nearly a year since I last wrote, but I dare ask: How much does it cost to feed one’s bloody dog? Would a NT$3,600 handout cover the costs for a year or is it better to invest in enemas? I ask this because I want to know what motivates the downtrodden jerk in the building next to mine who can’t afford gas money to drive his mutt out of town and abandon him there?
Yes, my newly adopted dog, which I’ve named Rescue (he’s already acquired a taste for beer — I’m very proud) was abandoned outside his gated and guarded front door barely six months into Emperor Ma’s reign. I guess pets weren’t factored into the 6 percent growth, 3 percent unemployment and US$30,000 household. But as political promises go, who was?
There is, however, an arrest warrant already out on poor Rescue’s head for urinating on public property, and we’ve already spoken (I being his attorney) about his refusal to accept any dog food whilst incarcerated. That’ll teach all those rotten individuals using the economic cycle as an excuse to abandon their dogs!
He’ll howl out his poetry in the cell next to former president “A-bian” and reminisce about the days when persecution was persecution and the economic situation was sublime. Both are gone, in a way, but we can’t get hold of the idea for some reason. Perhaps it has more to do with logic and reason.
It’s like when “President of Taiwan,” as a title, meant something, to someone, whether he served Taiwan autocratically or not. But that matters not. We’re a “Chinese Taipei” here, “Province of Taiwan” there, “Republic of Something” sometimes — and a “Taiwan” nowhere. Well, we are here existentially and all, but we’re slipperier than a greased pig at a UN Security Council meeting, aren’t we?
I imagine the scenario thus: “Gentlemen, as per directive 6-755 we’ve greased a pig, tattooed “ROC” on it for symbolic yet practical reasons and let it loose in the General Assembly chamber. First to catch it gets to decide what to do with it.”
France, if so nimble and lucky to be the first, would sodomize it and let it go; England might chop off its hooves and throw them in the slow cooker; China would slaughter the carcass on the podium; Russia would torture it, split it in two and sell it; and the US would hawk it to the restaurant across the street.
But I harp on trivial matters. Taiwan is what it is: an economy without explanation that was once an “economic miracle.” The rest, meaning the people, can be appeased here and prodded there. Just work and shut the hell up. Take a four-day weekend but expect to work the next Saturday.
I know … having lived here long enough I’m not actually complaining — just moaning. That’s still allowed, isn’t it?
Ma “false promises” Ing-joe and Chen “rescue me” Shui-bian, not to mention a slew of other slogans, rule the day.
At least the ING marathon is approaching, during which I might cleanse the sociopolitical gunk out of my gizzard.
It influenced my letter 11 months ago. I don’t expect Ma to run this year, though: The national bodyguard budget must nearly be spent after our illustrious red carpet mainland visitor graced our shores.
So this year I’m running with 1,000 four-legged, abandoned guards representing the minions of ill-gotten, unidentified and heedless Taiwanese souls. Our slogan: “Subsidized dog food from Carrefour for all.” I will run wrapped only in a Taiwanese flag (I’m patriotic — Taiwan has been good to me). That I’ll be dripping — underneath — in grease hoping that the police don’t catch on to my seditious sarcasm and extradite my Canadian ass is another matter.
Name withheld
(For obvious reasons, eh?)
Oh, OK, let’s see what happens.
Keith Justik
Johnny replies: It’s like they say: Grease may stink, but it’s the smell of freedom, brother.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS