In the eyes of most people, especially residents in southern Taiwan, the changes in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) attitude after he was elected president is the source of most criticism.
Before the presidential election, Ma’s visits to the south gave residents new hope, which helped him win by a landslide. However, since he was elected, he has not shown any concern for southerners.
Many media outlets are surprised at the south’s seemingly blind support for former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). But when we look at how Chen treated residents in the south compared with the way Ma treats them, it is easy to understand why.
With so many southern voters losing their trust in Ma, it is natural for them to compare him to his predecessor. Since Ma cannot replace Chen in their eyes, how can we criticize this attitude?
Ma seems to be drifting further away from southern voters. He has not only failed to show concern for residents in the south, but also ignored issues raised by local politicians. All of this has disappointed many of his supporters.
We can see this change in the way many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or independent candidates tried their best to associate themselves with Ma during the legislative elections, but have now started distancing themselves from him. If Ma continues on this path, the political landscape that has been so difficult to put together may gradually fall apart.
Moreover, while Ma took the initiative to get closer to people in the south prior to the presidential election, he doesn’t give them any chance to voice their concerns now.
To address these discrepancies and changes in Ma’s attitude, southerners have taken to the streets and plan many more street protests in Taipei — all of which are meant to pressure Ma into listening to them.
We feel sad about this state of affairs. After all, this is not only a matter of political interest, but also a reflection of overall public disapproval. The problem of ineffective politicians can be solved, but we have yet to see any sincere effort on the government’s part to change.
It is true that Ma’s approval ratings have slipped and that he has tried to regain public support by proposing many measures, including a government plan to issue consumer vouchers to every citizen and a policy to reduce unemployment. However, if he had visited the south in person more frequently, he might not have had such a hard time.
Even if Chen is accused of corruption, many people continue to support him. On the other hand, even though Ma works hard to govern the country, his approval ratings are falling. Does Ma understand the reason for this?
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at Shih Chien University in Kaohsiung.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS