In the past, if mainstream media did not cover certain incidents, nobody would have known about it. Today, the Wild Strawberry Student Movement has made use of the Internet to link up protesters across the country and created a new force. Nevertheless, the students would be well advised to consider how they could improve their movement.
Traditional media outlets have argued that the Wild Strawberry Student Movement would be difficult to maintain because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) have adopted a strategy of waiting until the demonstrators give up. This is why the student movement has encountered so many setbacks. Distorted and slanderous media coverage of the movement has given rise to biased public opinion toward the group.
The demonstrators should not give up, because their live Internet TV reports highlighted certain problems with traditional media. In particular, the shallow media coverage of the movement failed to clearly represent the three major appeals of the students, which in turn led to a discrepancy between public perception of the movement and reality. That is to say, the public should compare Internet reports with media coverage and form their own opinion based on what they find reliable and believable.
Nobody expected much from a civil movement like the Wild Strawberry movement in the beginning. If professors or experienced student movement activists could have helped design issues to attract public attention and if the students had aggressively created issues using blogs, Internet forums, stickers, Web sites and the Google community, the movement would have been more successful.
I have been a journalist for decades and I have to say that while news tools are constantly changing and becoming more diversified, the primary goal of news should be to remain truthful and get the facts right.
Many students may have had little, if any, experience dealing with the media, but they need not worry, because they have access to tools such as BBS, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. These may seem like small, insignificant things, but these tools can be used as platforms to reach every corner of society. The weeks-long sit-has gained wide recognition both in Taiwan and abroad. This shows how influential new media tools have become.
There are also many examples of smaller groups fighting against larger forces. For example, in February, 4 million Colombians dressed in white T-shirts hit the streets in protest against kidnappings carried out by Colombia’s left-wing guerrilla group Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). This protest was planned and mobilized using Facebook. Another example came in March, when a group of bloggers in Taiwan conducted an online fundraising campaign to help save the Losheng Sanatorium from being demolished to make room for a Mass Rapid Transport depot. This group managed to raise NT$200,000 in a single day. The bloggers then placed advertisements in newspapers and called a large protest to save Losheng.
These actions turned the Losheng Sanatorium into a topic for the Democratic Progressive Party in the preliminary presidential debates and forced the government to slow down its plans to demolish it.
These examples show that with perseverance on issues that matter, it is possible to change things. This power can ultimately be used to improve our country.
Let us hope that each member of the Wild Strawberry Student Movement can continue to fight for his or her beliefs.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG AND DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS