In the past, if mainstream media did not cover certain incidents, nobody would have known about it. Today, the Wild Strawberry Student Movement has made use of the Internet to link up protesters across the country and created a new force. Nevertheless, the students would be well advised to consider how they could improve their movement.
Traditional media outlets have argued that the Wild Strawberry Student Movement would be difficult to maintain because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) have adopted a strategy of waiting until the demonstrators give up. This is why the student movement has encountered so many setbacks. Distorted and slanderous media coverage of the movement has given rise to biased public opinion toward the group.
The demonstrators should not give up, because their live Internet TV reports highlighted certain problems with traditional media. In particular, the shallow media coverage of the movement failed to clearly represent the three major appeals of the students, which in turn led to a discrepancy between public perception of the movement and reality. That is to say, the public should compare Internet reports with media coverage and form their own opinion based on what they find reliable and believable.
Nobody expected much from a civil movement like the Wild Strawberry movement in the beginning. If professors or experienced student movement activists could have helped design issues to attract public attention and if the students had aggressively created issues using blogs, Internet forums, stickers, Web sites and the Google community, the movement would have been more successful.
I have been a journalist for decades and I have to say that while news tools are constantly changing and becoming more diversified, the primary goal of news should be to remain truthful and get the facts right.
Many students may have had little, if any, experience dealing with the media, but they need not worry, because they have access to tools such as BBS, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. These may seem like small, insignificant things, but these tools can be used as platforms to reach every corner of society. The weeks-long sit-has gained wide recognition both in Taiwan and abroad. This shows how influential new media tools have become.
There are also many examples of smaller groups fighting against larger forces. For example, in February, 4 million Colombians dressed in white T-shirts hit the streets in protest against kidnappings carried out by Colombia’s left-wing guerrilla group Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). This protest was planned and mobilized using Facebook. Another example came in March, when a group of bloggers in Taiwan conducted an online fundraising campaign to help save the Losheng Sanatorium from being demolished to make room for a Mass Rapid Transport depot. This group managed to raise NT$200,000 in a single day. The bloggers then placed advertisements in newspapers and called a large protest to save Losheng.
These actions turned the Losheng Sanatorium into a topic for the Democratic Progressive Party in the preliminary presidential debates and forced the government to slow down its plans to demolish it.
These examples show that with perseverance on issues that matter, it is possible to change things. This power can ultimately be used to improve our country.
Let us hope that each member of the Wild Strawberry Student Movement can continue to fight for his or her beliefs.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG AND DREW CAMERON
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS