Crying foul
Dear Johnny,
I’m afraid Taiwan’s fall into the Dragon’s Mouth of Communist China is going faster than water being flushed. US President George W. Bush has the bragging rights of kicking former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) long before President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took his turn.
Mr Bush and his fellow Republicans decided it was in the long-term interest of their pocketbooks to dump the goal of democracy in the Asia-Pacific. This meant that Taiwan had to go. Not completely, of course — there was still some military equipment they could sell. Also, they needed the threat of intervention to get the best trading terms they could. You gotta remember, it’s not that Bush and friends disliked Taiwan, but money is money.
As for Chen, I don’t know if his sin of using an expense account for unanswerable answers is a bigger sin than Mr Ma’s unanswerable answers, but politics is politics. I do think the Democratic Progressive Party ought to cry foul though: The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leader got to walk the streets free like a human being while they found him “not guilty.” Of course, the KMT has no history of democracy.
I cried foul and wrote a letter to Bush at the White House, but as expected I got the standard reply: “Thank you, but the White House cannot respond to every message.” I’m sure Mr Ma does the same thing.
I wish the Taiwanese people a lot of luck with the KMT and its rush to communism. I just hope that the next time I take my wife back to visit her family there aren’t armed soldiers on every other street.DALE BUTLER
Johnny replies: With a bit of luck — bittersweet luck — the soldiers you see will be those of the Neihu Freedom Force, posted to protect civilians and essential infrastructure (7-Elevens, KTVs, food malls) from official molestation.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then