In 1938, Adolf Hitler carried out a “peaceful unification” of Germany and Austria. Is the same thing about to happen between Taiwan and China?
Let us take a look at the process through which the Austrians voted in favor of joining Germany in a referendum.
Germany and Austria share both language and people, and just like the Republic of China’s Constitution aims for unification with China, unification with Germany was the political goal of the Austrian Constitution at the time.
Hitler’s intent to annex Austria was also obvious. When he met then Austrian chancellor Kurt von Schuschnigg in 1938, he pushed hard for the legalization of the Austrian National Socialist party and forced von Schuschnigg to appoint two members of the Nazi party to his Cabinet.
Hitler then demanded the dismissal of Alfred Jansa, the Austrian chief of staff who had defended the Austrian border from German invasion, a move that left the border wide open.
Under renewed pressure from Hitler, von Schuschnigg announced a defensive referendum in an attempt to guarantee Austrian independence. On the eve of the referendum, however, German troops invaded Austria — and were warmly welcomed. The Germans then held the referendum and unification was supported by 99.7 percent of the voters.
Not even the United Kingdom, the world’s super power at this time, had expected such expediency, and then British prime minister Neville Chamberlain was forced to adopt a policy of appeasement.
Prior to the Austrian invasion, Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler was already busy orchestrating the arrest of prominent individuals opposed to the Nazis. Within a few days of the invasion, more than 70,000 socialists, communists and members of the nobility who opposed unification had been arrested. Arrests on this scale would have been impossible without name lists put together with the help of the Austrian Nazi Party.
Looking at the cooperation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party — the promotion of a cross-strait common market, refusing to treat China as an enemy, the diplomatic truce, the appointment of former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) to represent Taiwan at the APEC meeting, the judiciary’s score settling with the pan-green camp, and so on — in the light of Hitler’s “peaceful unification” with Austria is a terrifying exercise and there are many lessons to be learned.
There was the initial establishment of an economic alliance followed by the elimination of Austria’s military force, the forcing of the Austrian government to appoint specific people to key positions, the orchestration of the arrests of Nazi opponents and finally the domestic cooperation by the Austrian Nazis.
Germany’s “peaceful unification” with Austria remains a prime example of how the collapse of democracy undermines sovereignty. Will 400 years of colonial history repeat itself in Taiwan four years from now?
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of the Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS